Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2009-03-26 06:55:01

nubemet
Member
Registered: 2009-03-25
Posts: 8

Self defence and mathematics

A man is caught going on an airplane with a bomb in his suitcase.

In his interrogation, he is asked for his motives and who sent him to do it.

The man says, that he did not intend to explode the bomb. It was just for self defence.

Detective: "Self Defence?" hmm

Man: "Yep, Self Defence".

Detective: "Explain"

Man: "Have you heared of probability theory? what are the chances that on the same plane there will be two independent bombers?"

Detective: dizzy


cool

Offline

#2 2009-03-26 07:28:15

Jai Ganesh
Administrator
Registered: 2005-06-28
Posts: 48,398

Re: Self defence and mathematics

Good one smile big_smile


It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

Online

#3 2009-03-26 09:49:16

Jai Ganesh
Administrator
Registered: 2005-06-28
Posts: 48,398

Re: Self defence and mathematics

The fact that there is already a bomber is implied.  Hence, the joke passes the test with high HQ, Humor Quotient!


It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

Online

#4 2009-03-26 10:55:00

JaneFairfax
Member
Registered: 2007-02-23
Posts: 6,868

Re: Self defence and mathematics

The correct logical reasoning should be: What are the chances that on the same plane there will be two independent bombers, given that there is already a bomber? (And no, that was NOT implied! mad)

This is the same as the chances that there will be a bomber other than that man if that man hadn’t done anything. Hence that stupid man’s actions did not alter the chances of a plane bombing in any way whatsoever! down

Last edited by JaneFairfax (2009-03-26 11:33:34)

Offline

#5 2009-03-26 11:28:24

MathsIsFun
Administrator
Registered: 2005-01-21
Posts: 7,713

Re: Self defence and mathematics

And hence the "Huh? Oh! LOL!"


"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

#6 2009-03-26 15:31:50

nubemet
Member
Registered: 2009-03-25
Posts: 8

Re: Self defence and mathematics

JaneFairfax wrote:

The correct logical reasoning should be: What are the chances that on the same plane there will be two independent bombers, given that there is already a bomber? (And no, that was NOT implied! mad)

This is the same as the chances that there will be a bomber other than that man if that man hadn’t done anything. Hence that stupid man’s actions did not alter the chances of a plane bombing in any way whatsoever! down

Yep. So the joke is on this man, and since u're right...its on me too smile

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB