You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
When there are two numbers x and y, such that both x,y ≥1,
does it follow that y^x is always greater than x^y if x is greater than y?
No.
This is true only if y is greater than a certain CRITICAL Value.
Many years back, I tried to find this critical value of y for certain values of x.
Value of x Approximate value of y
10 1.3712886
100 1.04955
1000 1.0069805
10,000 1.000922309
100,000 1.00011514925
1,000,000 1.0000138158
10,000,000 1.00000161283
100,000,000 1.0000001843
1,000,000,000 1.0000000208
Illustration:- y^100 can be greater than 100^y only if the value of y ≥1.04955
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Mathsy, I think you missed this post!
With all the available technology, you could have well improved upon those digits!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Occasionally, the box goes away before I can read all the new posts. Usually when there have been lots of new posts and it takes me a long time to read them all. I think that's what happened here.
There's a strong pattern emerging there, though.
Do you think it's possible to rearrange x^y=y^x to find y in terms of x?
If you could do that, you could find the critical value for any value of x.
I've got as far as the yth root of y = the xth root of x, but now I'm stuck.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Hello, and welcome to the forum kylekatarn !
I will let Ganesh reply to this, but just thought I would say hi.
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
it seems that yCritical "slowly"(?) approaches the limit of 1 as x approaches +oo
looking forward to hear comments on this topic!
Yes, you are correct! ycritical approaches 1, but is certainly greater than 1, as x approaches + ∞
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
I've got as far as the yth root of y = the xth root of x, but now I'm stuck.
Interestingly, if yth root of y = xth root of x,
it does not automatically follow that x=y
For example, if x=4 and y=2,
then this is true!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
It's not possible to express y explicitly in terms of x using any of the standard elementary functions. However, there is a formal solution using something called the Lambert W function. This function can be evaluated using mathematical packages such as Maple and Mathematica, but no calculator currently has a button for it. See the references below for details.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW-Function.html
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/40804;_voi8-8bIm
http://www.orcca.on.ca/LambertW/
Another approach would be to use the Newton Raphson method. If a is an approximation to a root of
f(x) = 10^x - x^10 = 0, then a - f(a)/f'(a) will be a better approximation.
In this case, we have f'(x) = ln(10) * 10^x - 10x^9.
For example, if a = 1.4 is an approximate solution, then
1.4 - (10^1.4 - 1.4^10)/(ln(10) * 10^1.4 - 10*1.4^9) ~= 1.3744 is a better approximation.
This converges quite rapidly. The next two convergents are, to 10 decimal places, 1.3713296532 and
1.3712885814.
http://www.sosmath.com/calculus/diff/der07/der07.html
Finally, here's a page which will solve, for example, the equation 10^x = x^10, giving several answers in terms of the Lambert W function (aka the ProductLog function), along with the numeric values.
http://www.hostsrv.com/webmab/app1/MSP/quickmath/02/pageGenerate?site=quickmath&s1=equations&s2=solve&s3=basic
2 + 2 = 5, for large values of 2.
Offline
Pages: 1