You are not logged in.
Hi gAr;
Gets me too! Here is how I understand it.
This is called the geometric distribution.
Where p is probability of success on each trial. q = 1 - p. So to get a six throwing a fair die the expected number of throws is.
This formula does not include the last successful trial so you add one to it.
E(number of trials to get a 6) = 6
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Oh, ok.
I'll check more about that.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
New problem!
Mixing oil and vinegar?
We have 2 identical buckets one is filled with olive oil and the other with vinegar. I take 3 gallons out of both and transfer it to the other bucket. The buckets are stirred thoroughly and I transfer 2 gallons from each to the other. I repeat this step 261 times. I end up with the same amount of vinegar in both buckets. How much do the buckets hold?
A says) Sounds like you are making a salad. By the way they are 10 gallon buckets.
B says) Nope, that is wrong. I have the right and only answer.
C says) You might have tha answer B, but it is not the only one!
D says) Yes, it is!
Who is right?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
I'd like to know if you have another way. This may not be the simplest way, I guess.
Last edited by gAr (2011-03-10 21:24:01)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Great, that means I got the uglier one for you.
Now that's cool!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Yes but ugliness is in the eye of the beholder.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
That's true!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Tough one?
A says) I have the closed form for n.
B says) I have n to 100 digits.
C says) I have a headache.
Which do you have?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
I don't know closed forms for this kind.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hi bobbym,
I wrote a script to compute that sum.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
How did you get the sum? I know you take the log of both sides but what did you do then?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
I actually computed the sum for 500 terms, maybe less than 100 terms would suffice: sum(log(2*n+1)/(2^n),n,1,500), then computed the exponential.
How did you compute?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Sorry, I did not see your post:
I computed it just as you see it as nested radicals. I do not think there is a closed form for that.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
It's ok.
Did you know about Lerch transcendent?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
I have heard of it and seen Mathematica spit out Lerch Phi but I do not know anything about it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
New problem:
Theres a plant thats climbing up and around a tree trunk that has the shape of a cylinder. The plant is climbing in a spiral manner. The tree trunk has a height of two hundred and forty inches and a circumference of thirty-two inches. If the plant covers a vertical distance of sixty inches in one complete twist around the tree trunk, what is the total length of the plant?
A says) 834.261 inches.
B says) That is not right .
C says) You are right B it is 842.771 inches.
B says) That is not right either. It is 272 inches.
D says) I actually have a vine like that, and a tree like that. The answer is, by measurement, 300 inches
B says) Amazing!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Sleep well.
And for that solution, I thought you'd have done the same way, so I didn't try to explain in detail.
Perhaps a figure could do some explaining.
I had seen in the past a similar type of question in william wu's riddles page, which hinted that it wouldn't require more than high school math.
After a long time, I'm able to understand the hint!
Last edited by gAr (2011-03-15 05:08:03)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
I was thinking that is what you did. I just never thought of it like that. In addition to everything else you are very erudite. Congratulations, a simple and elegant solution!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Thank you.
Calling me "erudite" is an exaggeration, I have a long way to go!
Anyway, what is the more complicated solution?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline