You are not logged in.
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
You're welcome!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
New problem:
Super tough:
There is the set S ={ 1,2,3,4 ,...32}. A guesses 8 numbers with replacement from S. B guesses 8 numbers with replacement from S. What is the probability that the Intersection of their guesses is {}?
A says) 1 / 3
B says) Watch it A it is not that simple. I recognize the problem. I have the answer.
C says) I get 1 / 4.
D says) Yes, it is 1 / 4.
E says) I recognize it too.
Do you recognize the problem? Can you get the answer?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Okay, I'll check again.
Do you have the exact answer?
Last edited by gAr (2011-08-23 00:27:43)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Okay, I'll ask you later.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
I did it a different way. Actually it fell right into my hands without any struggle at all. Happens every once in a while. Wish it would happen more!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Really?!
How did you compute?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
I started thinking about it as a Birthday problem. But it had a weird form because it matched up two groups instead of two birthdays. So I started to research the birthday problem again to see what I missed. And there it was!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthday_p … day_as_you
Half way down the page was:
"Generalization to multiple types."
There was a double series and and a product. Took a while but I got that to work.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Okay, I'll take a look.
Did you generalize for more than 2 people also?
Last edited by gAr (2011-08-24 18:50:38)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
Do you mean more than two groups or two matches?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes.
I meant for the problem posed here.
If there are more than two persons guessing?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
Yes, there is a generaliztion for any number of people guessing. I can not get the journal article though!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Okay.
Checked that formula, nicely matches the result.
Glad to know that there is another way to solve it!
I hope we can tweak either of the methods to extend it to 'n' persons.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
There is a computationally easier method than the formula but it is probably just an approximation.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
What is that formula?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
This is a very good approximation. It saves a lot of time when the problem is large. But I do not see how to expand it to more guessers.
I have cleaned up some bad latexing to avoid any further confusion.
Then you subtract from 1.
That is the approximate answer.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Did you mean
I checked for d = 32 and m = n = 8. That was close enough.
Meanwhile, from the egf, I got a formula:
The second summation looks familiar, isn't it ? (No. of onto functions?)
I tried to extend this to 3 guessers and got a probability of 0.101284979371866, not sure though.
Hmmm, I just learned that my formula is identical to
Now, I have another answer for 3 people guessing
Using the formula of birthday problem, we get a similar result:
A simulation also shows a value nearby. So, I think we may extend it like that for more people and get an asymptotic form.
Last edited by gAr (2011-08-25 01:12:26)
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Yes, that is what I meant for the previous post. Got carried away with
the latex!
Yes, that looks good. We might be able to guess at an asymptotic form but I do not have a method that can get it. Those formulas are computationally intensive, but they solve the smaller problems nicely.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline