You are not logged in.
Hi gAr;
Thanks for looking at it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
New Problem:
You are given an integer t ( 0 to 9 ). You can use decimal points, multiplication, addition, division, subtraction, parentheses and exponentiation only. How close can you get to Euler's number using t only? You can use t as many times as you want.
A says) I got it using 3 t"s.
B says) Nonsense! Not with 3 you didn't.
C says) 4 t's is about right.
D says) Yep!
E says) 3 is definitely not the best.
What is t and what is your expression?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
New Problem!
E does a bit of numeric work for someone. She is asked to Hornerize the LHS. She gets the RHS.
A says) It is going to be hard to check if she is right. You have to expand that to
be sure.
B says) You only have to try two numbers for x.
C says) Holy Zeilberger! B is right!
D says) I do not think so...
A says) Kaboobly doo, no amount of numbers plugged in can verify that expression.
You should go back to school B! Finite tests are not infinity! You can not prove things by plugging in three or four numbers and then saying it is true. Mathematics B, is a deductive science.
E says) Stop hollering A. B is on the right track but it will take a couple of numbers.
B says) Nope, two is plenty.
Who is right?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Meanwhile,
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Thanks.
And I don't have another answer for #1030.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
The general case:
For 2 polynomials:
Choose
Then trying the points from S is all that is required to determine equality.
If the coefficients of P(x) and Q(x) are positive. Then only 2 values are necessary.
1) If P(1) = Q(1)
and
2) P(P(1)+1) = Q(Q(1)+1)
Then P(x) = Q(x)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
P(P(1)+1) = Q(Q(1)=1)
Is that Q(1)+1 instead of Q(1)=1 ?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Yikes an ugly typo! You are correct, I have cleaned up the mess in the above post. Thanks.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Okay.
I don't understand what's unique about P(1)+1
Will this work for polynomials only with positive coefficients?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
I do not get the reason either. That one is for positive
coefficients only. The other is for any two polynomials.
Zeilberger mentions it. It is part of their method of proving theorems by trying a finite amount of cases. Exactly what they tell not to do in mathematics. But yet Ramanujan did it and the experimental mathematicians are following.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Hmmm, okay.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Is that a hmmm, meaning, ah maybe. Or is it meaning, that bobbym is sure weird. Personally, I am going with the weird one.
The general one I know is true the second one I never heard of.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
"Hmmm" as in I'm not totally sure with any answer yet!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
I know, I am just kidding.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
I knew you were kidding!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
How could you know?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi,
Because you aren't weird!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
I am going to change my image. Have you noticed weird people
are smarter?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Okay.
Yes, I have. What's "important" to the majority doesn't matter to them.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
To be brilliant one has to be a little crazy. Or maybe very crazy. A little bit uncaring.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline