You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Can we continue the thread here?
Anyway, 100! equals
9.332622e157.
What is e?
Speaking of e... I got E on GeoGebra, I zoomed out and it ended up with 6.5E9. I know thats greater than 1,000,000 units, because I passed that.
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
e or E in this case stands for exponent. If you say
5.3434 e4 that means 5.3434 x 10^4
9.332622e157 that means 9.332622 x 10^157
6.5E9 that means 6.5 x 10^9
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
So...
on GeoGebra, 6.5e9 is
20,711,912.8 units?
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
6.5E9 = 6.5 x 10^9 = 6 500 000 000, I do not know how you are getting 20,711,912.8
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I figured that 100! is somewhere around...
654,747,700,701,377,386,126,856,657,861,679,570,529,800,895,801,424,573,182,559,133,258,946,484,061,065,580,876,771,978,236,269,380,302,819,031,314,362,546,968,961,704,181,923,607,153,180,171,236,969. That's QUINDECILLIONS!
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
Hi;
Not quite.
100!= 93326215443944152681699238856266700490715968264381621468592963895217599993229915608941463976156518286253697920827223758251185210916864000000000000000000000000
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Was I close?
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
Hi;
You were off by a factor of 142 million.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Speaking of infinity, I think 0^0= -0, which is infinity... for it is beyond definition....
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
GeoGebra said it was infinity too.
I scrolled over and i found a maximum of 10E19.
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
10E19 is...
10,000,000,000,000,000,000 units... that is like a.... QUINTILLION!
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
You are missing one 0 in there...
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
100,000,000,000,000,000,000?
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
That is correct!
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
0^0 does not equal -0
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It's a theory!
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
It is not a theory since you didn't show any arguments that it should be so...
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
What is -0?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It's undefined...
bwahahahahahahaha
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
No, it is not. -0 is equal to 0.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
0 is neither -0 or +0.
- n872yt3r
Math Is Fun Rocks!
By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you!
Offline
If you mean to say that zero is neither positive nor negative, you're absolutely correct. But '-0' isn't the same as saying 'zero is negative'!
To see why 0 is the same as -0 and +0, imagine +1, +2, and so on, as a line starting from zero, like this:
A negative number is the same as a positive number, except you reverse the line. It's Stays the same length and still starts at zero, but it's flipped. For example, -2 looks like this:
You can imagine "flipping the line" with numbers closer and closer to zero (shorter and shorter lines). But what happens when your line gets so short that it doesn't really have length? (You could say "0 length").
By that stage, you don't really have a line anymore. You have a point which represents zero:
Because it doesn't have any length "flipping" it doesn't change it, so +0 is the same as -0.
Offline
Hi;
Please follow the other thread. There you will find good reasons for 0^0 = 1.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Last edited by 21122012 (2013-01-27 10:53:53)
"The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus"
Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it!
Offline
Pages: 1