You are not logged in.
What are the chances that 6 people celebrate their Birthday in the same 2 months? Assume all months are equal.
Last edited by anna_gg (2013-03-24 01:27:25)
Offline
Hi;
Last edited by bobbym (2013-03-24 01:13:40)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi;
See my corrected description.
Offline
Hi;
That is a little different. I hope I am understanding what you want. It seems you want all six people to have their birthdays in only two months.
For that I am getting.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Right
Offline
Hi;
Whamo! Wunderbar! Doron Zeilberger eat your heart out. Am I the king of comby/proby or what?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
How'd you get that answer?
And, I am pretty sure his last name is Zielberger.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
No, it is Zeilberger. The way I get all the answers I get.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes. I permuted the i and the e. It seems to be common with me. I have a tough time remembering whether it's Liebniz or Leibniz.
Direct count?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
No, all combinatoric problems fall into categories. Surely you have read the 12 fold way or even better the 30 fold way. I have my own set in addition to those. These templates help solve many types of problems.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Would you mind sharing?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Of course you were half right I already had the answer before I even began.
Of course, I will put down the formula-template here.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Great, thank you!
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
This looks like some of Feller's work or maybe Rose, I am not sure.
Surely you recognize that?!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
What the hell is that?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Looks like a formula! So you do not recognize it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It looks like some stuff I've seen on Wiki's distributions pages.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Better than that. With that you compute the answer to anna's problem quickly.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I will try to share my solution in a more explanatory way (Sorry, Bobby, I don't imply that yours is not easy to understand - it is just that I am a novice and not very familiar with complicated solutions!!):
We first must calculate all the possible ways to get 2 months out of 12, that is
Then we must calculate all the different ways by which we can arrange the birthdays of 6 people in these 2 months: Either 5 people have their birthday in the first month and 1 in the second, or 4 in the first and 2 in the second etc. Obviously we do not consider the case of 0/6 or 6/0. For the first case, we first get 1 out of 6 (for the first persons birthday) and then for the second persons it will be 5 out of 5, and so on.
Here is the calculation:
The total probability is the product of the first two (66 x 62) divided by the total number of all different ways by which 6 people can have their birthdays in 12 different months, that is, 12^6.
So we have
Last edited by anna_gg (2013-03-30 04:58:57)
Offline
Hi anna_gg;
Sorry, Bobby, I don't imply that yours is not easy to understand
No problem. I am glad to see your solution. Also, anyone who can do that problem I do not characterize as a novice.
Have you tried Codecogs?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
No I haven't; actually I wrote the solution in a Word doc, but when I copied it here, the formatting was screwed up (
Offline
Hi anna_gg;
I latexed it up for you.
When you have time try this site
http://latex.codecogs.com/editor.php
perfect math every time!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Thank you! Very useful!
Offline
Hi;
You are welcome and happy latexing.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hm, then the solution for n people seems to be 66*(2^n-2)/(12^6).
And thank you both for showing your methods.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline