You are not logged in.
This is my third version of the Julianthemath number (since Nehushtan got the rule of my sequence).
It is the sum of 2 consecutive square numbers, and 2 consecutive triangular numbers, minus the 2 square roots and 2 triangular roots. Here, for simplification :
S = Square
SR = Square Root
T = Triangular
TR = Triangular root
This is also called the : Squmintrius number (complex, right? )
Examples :
1. ( (1+4)-(1+2) ) + ( (1+3)-(1+2) )
( 5 - 3 ) + ( 4 - 3 )
2 + 1
3, a Squimintrius number
2. ( (4+9)-(2+3) ) + ( (3+6)-(2+3) )
( 13 - 5 ) + ( 9 - 5 )
8 + 4
12
3. ( (9+16)-(3+4) ) + ( (6+10)-(3+4) )
( 25 - 7 ) + ( 16 - 7 )
18 + 9
27
So, the Squimintrius sequence is : 3, 12, 27... So, what's the pattern here?
Last edited by julianthemath (2013-04-14 19:05:29)
Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate
Offline
That second number should be 12 not 11.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Oh.
Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate
Offline
48 is the next number.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Good. Next pattern soon!
Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate
Offline
How about this sequence:
-2, -1, 8, 31, 74, 143, 244, 383, 566, 799...
Guess the pattern.
Mathematichs is the queen of sciences - C. F. Gauss
Offline
Don't know. Maybe you should post it in "Berliner's number 1", or something
Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate
Offline
Thanks. By the way the formula was:
a(n) = n^3-2n^2-1
Mathematichs is the queen of sciences - C. F. Gauss
Offline
In the OEIS again.
Mathaholic | 10th most active poster | Maker of the 350,000th post | Person | rrr's classmate
Offline
It's one of my sequence
Mathematichs is the queen of sciences - C. F. Gauss
Offline
Continue this sequence and find the general form:
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,...
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Did you check the OEIS?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
There are many possible answers that OEIS gives. But not all are the ones I am looking for.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
It could be a new sequence. I would like very much to see a few more terms. Can you compute them?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I am sure it is not new.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Okay, thanks for the help.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
This one:
1,5,4,22,26,86,...
on the other hand, is a new one. Or at least is not in the OEIS.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hmmm, now you are talking. Let's have a few more of em and we are in business.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Do you want just the terms or the reccurence?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
The recurrence? Of course, provide it!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It is kinda unusual, though.
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-04-15 08:41:37)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
The tensor operator does what here?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It represents the xor operation.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Okay, exclusive or. The next looks like a binary representation?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes, that is what it is.
You can replace it with this:
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-04-15 09:57:54)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline