You are not logged in.
Have you ever seen anonimnystefy's problem that he posed a while back?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Which problem is that?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 00#p243200
Any ideas since then?
See you a little later, chore came up.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
I did not spend much time on the problem after that, let me see whether I can get anything else this time.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Okay, thanks I am looking at it also.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-07-29 13:55:32)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
Upper and lower bounds imply some method of getting them. How?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hello,
gAr and bobbym those are the correct answers.
Offline
Hi;
Thanks for the problem.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hello:
How many Lucky Numbers are there and show 3 ways to find them?
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hello m:
I could use a bit of help on some M code.
Why do you call it Spasmatica?
Where does the integral come from? How can I evaluate it to many digits?
Offline
I do not always call it that. Sometimes it is Asthmatica as well as some more colorful names.
Everything came from the Lando lectures.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
What are the Lando lectures?
Offline
Lectures on Generating Functions by Lando, it is a book. I thought you had read it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I have that one.
How do you get the integral to say a hundred digits?
Offline
I have that one.
Yes I know. I gave it to you. You might try reading it.
M can handle the integral exactly. You do not need an approximate answer.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Oooh yes, I am sorry. It didn't work for me at first. The integral comes from complex analysis? From getting a0 of the Laurent series?
Offline
Hi,
I was thinking about the integral you wrote there, I had
I got the first two answers using the g.f
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
It is straight out of the book. It does get the right answer. The derivation is a bit too tough for me.
What did you think of the NCR answer?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
nCr answer is derived from the g.f:
[z^27] in
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hello gAr;
That is good but it can also be derived from the principle of inclusion and exclusion.
Offline
Hi;
I can follow gAr's better than that stuff on PIE. Did you understand it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi ElainaVW,
I usually get PIE answers wrong, so I try to stay away from it!
When it's the case that g.f. is possible, I go for that.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
That is the way I feel about it too. I have a done a few of them but prefer generating functions.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline