You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The limit of the nth root of n as n approaches infinity equals.... 1!!! I don't know about you guys but I find this extremely remarkable!
The proof of this uses just a simple common technique. I'll use the method of finding the limit of ln (n^(1/n)) as n approaches infinity, and raising e to the power of that limit.
limit of ln (n^(1/n)) as n approaches infinity
= limit of 1/n ln( n) as n approaches infinity = limit of (ln n)/n as n approaches infinity ( = ∞/∞) since this is an indeterminant form, we use L' hopitals rule, 1/n / 1 = 1/n. As n approaches infinity 1/n = 0.
e^0 = 1 so the limit of the the nth root of n as n approaches infinity is one! Thats just awsome! Check it on a calculator if you don't believe me.
Last edited by mikau (2006-02-24 11:06:24)
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
This reminds me of e in some ways. This seems to suggest 1^∞ = ∞ but this is impossible. Therefore it must be something like the limit of (1 + 1/x )^n as n approaches infinity and x is some function of n, and n does not equal x. (otherwise this would be e). I wonder if we could figure out the relation between n and x...
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
Given that 1/∞ = 0, it's not that surprising at all...
El que pega primero pega dos veces.
Offline
Yes and no. I mean, if you have 1/n, when n becomes significantly large, the exponant tends to be very small, but the base tends to get very large. Just like the definition of e. limit of (1 + 1/x)^x as x approaches infinity. You're inclined to say 1/x = 0 and eliminate it, but the infinitely small difference, to the infinitieth power makes a difference. Likewise, I was inclined to believe the smallness of the exponant would be "canceled out" by the hugeness of the base.
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
I haven't tried to understand your explanations, but it isn't remarkable to me.
#*#=2
#*#*#=3
#*#*#*#=4
#*#*#*#*#=5
#*#*#*#*#*#=6
The #'s go up slowly, but multiplying is so powerful, why wouldn't you expect to
approach one from above? I would.
'Course I can't remember L'Hopital's Rule by its name. I have a lot to review.
Don't explain for me, I'll do some research...
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
maybe you guys are more familiar with limits then me and it doesn't come to such a suprise.
At any rate, the reason I didn't conclude that from the start, I could have looked at the exponant 1/n and figured this comes to zero so its one no matter what, but singling out and isolating a piece of a limit and evaluating can be dangerous, ESPECIALLY when they are directly connected to infinitly large numbers. I repeat: In the definition of e: Limit of (1 + 1/n)^n as n approaches infinity. Your inclined to notice the 1/n term and rewrite it as zero, but this infinitly small fraction is raised to an infinitly large power! So it does make a difference! Here we have the reverse, an infinitly large number being raised to an infinitly small power. For all I knew it might have ended up being 1/e or something like that. Thats why I made no assumptions.
Like I said, when infinitly small and infinitly large come in contact, sometimes they "cancel eachother out" so isolating each individual limit can be dangerous. Don't you agree?
Last edited by mikau (2006-02-24 17:40:58)
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
.99 ^ big number, goes down.
1.01^ big number, goes up.
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
I'm not really suprised at 1, but I really like the way mikau took the limit. Never would have thought of doing that.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
you mean taking the natural log, finding the limit, and raising e to that power? Thats a pretty common technique in my mathbook.
Anyways, the title of this thread is "who woulda thunk it?" clearly the answer is "everyone woulda thunk it.... except mikau..."
I feel stupid...
Last edited by mikau (2006-02-25 08:29:18)
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
Wait a minute...
It was shown somewhere else that this equation:
Had the solution of x = the nth root of n.
Surely, what you've just said means that:
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
now I'm confused.
technically the limit I found seems to suggest 1^∞ = ∞ but this is obviously not true. This is just the limit. 1 to any power = 1 no matter what. The nth root of n as n approaches infinity, tends to be 1, but 1 is the limit, it can never equal 1.
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
And, as John said, anything below 1 goes to 0.
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Pages: 1