You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
A town has only one male barber. If he shaves every man in the town except for those who shave themselves, does he shave himself?
Offline
Maybe just one hair at a time:
Status: I don't shave myself
Action: "snip"
Status: I do shave myself
Action: (stops, waits, looks around, notices lack of self-shaving)
Status: I don't shave myself
Action: "snip"
...
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
I cannot believe that I cannot believe that I am not the one who thought up this answer.
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
I figured out the answer. At first I wondered whether this was just one of those apparent paradoxes, resulting from a clever use of words; but when I realized what the solution is, I saw that there really is an answer. The solution has to do with an (incorrect) assumption that people will generally make upon hearing the question. When you are able to get past that assumption, then it becomes easy to figure out the correct answer. So, I am new here: Can someone tell me whether I am supposed to disclose the answer I came up with, or does that ruin it for everyone else?
Love is what matters most!
Offline
Hi Real! And welcome to the forum.
Yes, you can provide your solution - I am keen to read it!
If you want to, you can put the answer inside "hide" tags. They work like this:
And is done like this:
[hide=My Answer Is]Bananas![/hide]
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Boy let me tell you what:
I bet you didn't know it, but I'm a fiddle player too.
And if you'd care to take a dare, I'll make a bet with you.
Offline
Offline
Love is what matters most!
Offline
Love is what matters most!
Offline
I just want to thank the Administrator for welcoming me to this forum, and for explaining how to hide the answer.
Love is what matters most!
Offline
And a very good answer ... well done!
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
RealEstateBroker has actually given an acceptable solution! Well done!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Wikipedia doesn't give the answer, though.
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
A town has only one male barber. If he shaves every man in the town except for those who shave themselves, does he shave himself?
The problem implies the barber, being male, is shaven.
Another one:
This sentence is false.
True or False?
You can shear a sheep many times but skin him only once.
Offline
I think I've got a possible solution.
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
One question: what happens when a paradox like that is solved? I mean, that something that seems false, is indeed true and returns an answer?
Offline
Unfortunately, Real, he would not be considered a boy if he were working. Also, the term 'man' can be implied to the population of the world as a whole, and as such, can be applied to the population to the town which is a much smaller scale as it doesn't even work that way if we imply that the baber is actually female. Unfortunately, not all of the paradox is there, for yes, it is a paradox, and a nicely woven one as well, for the wording is just magnificent. I actually just read up on said paradox, and I do know the actual answer. However, I have yet to figure out how this is related to math, for every site I've been to so far has given it as a math paradox, when no math is included. What should be up here is a 'heap' paradox, such as this.
Assume the following two statements are true:
1. If you have zero dollars, you are not rich.
2. If you add a dollar, then you are still not rich.
As neither statement states and ending to the cycle, or a point in which you will become rich, and the second statement doesn't state to how much money you are adding said dollar to, you could have an infinite amount of dollars and you would still not be rich.
Oh, yes, the answer. Well, here it is.
Offline
Assume the following two statements are true:
1. If you have zero dollars, you are not rich.
2. If you add a dollar, then you are still not rich.As neither statement states and ending to the cycle, or a point in which you will become rich, and the second statement doesn't state to how much money you are adding said dollar to, you could have an infinite amount of dollars and you would still not be rich.
This sort of paradox is typically phrased with a boat. If you have a boat and you replace one of it's planks, it is still the same ship. The same if you replace n+1. But if you replace all of its planks, many would consider this a new ship.
The problem lies with using induction on something in which there is no clear cut transition, but that one certainly exists.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Pages: 1