Math Is Fun Forum

Primenumbers

Member

Registered: 2013-01-22

Posts: 149

I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation

for any integer value of n strictly greater than two.

Let

          where n >2

Then

    must equal:

must have opposite remainders for

Adding y to one and minusing y from another will keep them opposite if they are already opposite. So let's see if the two squares have opposite remainders for

.

If we add them together they should=0 if they are opposite.

No!

Fermat's Last theorem is True.

---

"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

thickhead

Member

Registered: 2016-04-16

Posts: 1,086

Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

What you are writing as remainder looks like quotient w.r.t c^n.

---

{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

googol

Member

From: Delft, The Netherlands

Registered: 2016-04-22

Posts: 13

Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

FLT proof via Pythagorean triplets.

---

10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

thickhead

Member

Registered: 2016-04-16

Posts: 1,086

Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

Now it looks like Primenumbers' LOST THEOREM

---

{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}