You are not logged in.
Hi y'all!!
I wanna start an
Rules are easy: person which solves an integral, may post the next one but he must have the approval of the person which proposed the previous integral if the answer is correct or not.
Let's start with an easy one
Compute
Best regards!
Offline
sec(x) - tan(x) + x + C?
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
That's correct.
You can post the next one.
Offline
Last edited by mikau (2007-07-11 19:51:38)
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
but he must have the approval of the person which proposed the previous integral if the answer is correct or not
Why not just differentiate back and check? Also, is there any need to use blatantly sexist language?
Offline
sec(x) - tan(x) + x + C?
Sorry, you have to show us your solution (I dunno what I was thinking that I didn't ask you that).
Show your solution too.
Why not just differentiate back and check? Also, is there any need to use blatantly sexist language?
Well, actually when I was writing I didn't realize of that.
If you don't mind, please limit to make all type of disagreeable commentary. There're forms and forms to request the things.
Offline
Thats right, Jane. Good job! Looks like you're next as soon as you show your solution.
and here's my solution to the first problem.
∫sin x /(1 +sin x) dx = ∫[-sin^2(x) + sin x ]/(1 - sin^2(x)) dx
= ∫ -sin^2(x)/cos^2(x) - sin(x)/cos^2(x) dx
= ∫ -tan^2(x) + sec(x)tan(x) dx
= ∫ 1 -sec^2(x) + sec(x)tan(x)dx = x - tan(x) + sec(x) + C QED.
Last edited by mikau (2007-07-12 08:26:04)
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
Also, is there any need to use blatantly sexist language?
Which reminds me:
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
That last comic was superb!
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
i'll say!
We're still waiting for you to post the next one, Jane!
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
Offline
Offline
Doesn't this sort of thing also belong in Puzzles and Games? It is kind of a game, after all, it does follow the rule of most forum-based games.
Offline
Maybe it used to, but now it belongs in the "Jane is mean " section.
We don't have one of those yet, so it might as well stay here.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Jane is mean
Why?
Offline
is that meant to be interpreted as:
?
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
Oops, typo. That should read "mathsy is dumb "
For some reason I read that as e^-x², and thought you were giving an impossible one. The didn't help either.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Last edited by JaneFairfax (2007-07-16 00:22:43)
Offline
For some reason I read that as e^-x², and thought you were giving an impossible one. The didn't help either.
Offline
Now Jane, go again.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Yes.
Ive also seen
I believe you can integrate an absolutely convergent series term by term within its radius of convergence, and the result would be another absolutely convergent series?
Rickys turn.
Last edited by JaneFairfax (2007-07-16 11:02:54)
Offline
Pass.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
I forgot to mention that don't post integrals which don't have a primitive function in elementary terms.
Offline
Pass? :-( Who's next?
how about
Last edited by mikau (2007-07-16 12:36:11)
A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.
Offline
Not impossible but it involves complex analysis. I would suggest picking a different integral.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline