You are not logged in.
Wikipedia has nearly 2 Million Articles!
1,998,597 right now.
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Wow ... that certainly is an amazing achievement! But Wikipedia has some useless spam on it, however. I once saw a page with nothing but 'asdfadgdaga' all over it.
Offline
Pages like that are very rare and are quickly eradicated. Wikipedia is amazing, bringing knowledge to the masses.
Offline
And it is free for anyone to edit, I must say it's convenient yet inconvenient.
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
And it is free for anyone to edit, I must say it's convenient yet inconvenient.
Also usable, yet unusable.
Just gone 2,000,430
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Wow.... Are you talking about the whole wiki or just the EN version?
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
English one! Now at 2,001,110
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
2 0 0 7 5 7 9 now!! wikipedia.org
I like reading wikipedia. The index is fun to use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Quick_index
And the random article is neat too!
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
That is a handy index for browsing!
Does anyone know how to see a list of newest articles?
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
2,010,345 articles now
it seems to change every minute
i absolutely hate the fact that wikipedia is blasted for the fact that it can easily be changed
i mean they correct incorrect edits very quickly
especially those that are clearly wrong
and those that are very subtle eventually get fixed
i mean if they are gonna blast it for something make it viable
like the fact that it is very biased
for exampple
only the creators of organization write the info abou ttheir own organization
so it bound to be biased and exagerated
this can be appliued to bands, organizations, gov groups, biographies, etc
and ppl usuallyd dont mess with that stuff
cuz they dont know anythign about them
and ppl usually dont mess with that
cuz the ppl who mess with wikipedia info are usually immature kids who are doing hist reports
and usually hist info gets messed up
not tusff for organizations and groups
Offline
because it's free and many millions come to it to read stuff.
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
Yea...
But it can be really useful to students like me. All my research materials come from wikipedia.
Offline
Maybe this?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T:DYK
(template:Did you know) posts new articles, might be all done by hand, not automated?
igloo myrtilles fourmis
Offline
Wikipedia knows all! It knows all the opinions of everyone everywhere who has delusions that they have the smallest inkling of knowledge about a subject; thus a master and able to pass their views off as compelte and utter true fact that is not argueable or changable at any time! YAY WIKIPEDIA!
Boy let me tell you what:
I bet you didn't know it, but I'm a fiddle player too.
And if you'd care to take a dare, I'll make a bet with you.
Offline
Anyone any idea with Microsoft's Encycropedia? (if miss-spelled, sorry)
X'(y-Xβ)=0
Offline
Microsoft's Encyclopedia will be even worse. It'll be like Wikipedia, but with Microsoft propaganda. "Mac drags. Buy Windows instead"
Boy let me tell you what:
I bet you didn't know it, but I'm a fiddle player too.
And if you'd care to take a dare, I'll make a bet with you.
Offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/2007-01-23#INFINITE_0.9_.3C.3E_1
Anthony.R.Brown has made it to Wikipedia.
Offline
How DID you find that ????
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Interesting.
I shall be on leave until I say so...
Offline
How DID you find that ????
I don't know sometimes ... it's amazing what you can find on Wikipedia.
Offline
i realy wonder about what really makes an article legitimte (excuse my spelling) for wikipedia
i mean
there are those ppl who post biographies of themselvs
which is kinda not awesome
but what really makes an artcle legit???
there was once an artice that i found that was of an organiztion
which was kind of lgit
but it was also very unorganized
but then it got deleted quickly
so back to my first question
Offline
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Math_Is_Fun
Last edited by shocamefromebay (2007-10-04 09:32:21)
Offline
Nice link, shocamefromebay!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
i realy wonder about what really makes an article legitimte (excuse my spelling) for wikipedia
i mean
there are those ppl who post biographies of themselvs
which is kinda not awesome
but what really makes an artcle legit???
there was once an artice that i found that was of an organiztion
which was kind of lgit
but it was also very unorganized
but then it got deleted quicklyso back to my first question
there are loooots of rules/guidelines at wikipedia, on how to write articles.. start here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia
Support MathsIsFun.com by clicking on the banners.
What music do I listen to? Clicky click
Offline
Nice link, shocamefromebay!
thanks
i really wonder how wikipedia people make money
i dont find any ads on their articles
and they have TONS of articles
and so many other things on it
i really wonder where they get their paychecks from
Offline