You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
3 frens went to cafe.the bill was $75
Each gave $25
Waiter took it to counter.
The cashier decided to give them a dicount of $5 & asked waiter to return them $5
Now the waiter was confused, how to distribute $5 among 3 people?
He kept $2 in his pocket and gave $1 to each person.
So now each person actually paid $24 as they had taken one dollar back.
so $24 × 3=$72 and $2 in waiter pocket
It adds up to $74 but they had paid $75
Where is the remainding $1?
Offline
This is actually due to addition of the wrong figures. By discounting 5$, they actually pay approximately $23.33 each, for a total of $70. They get $3 back, making the total $73. Add the amount the waiter took, the total would be $75. Yey!!!!
"There is not a difference between an in-law and an outlaw, except maybe that an outlaw is wanted"
Nisi Quam Primum, Nequequam
Offline
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Elsewhere, the waiter's much greedier brother was working in a different restaurant.
By a remarkable coincidence, three friends went out to eat and their bill also came to $75. Each gave $25, as before.
The cashier had a crush on one of the people, and decided to refund $50 of their bill.
The waiter was confused - how to split $50 among 3 people?
He decided to give them $1 each and keep $47 for himself.
Now, each person paid $24, as they got $1 back, making $72 in total. The waiter has $47 in his pocket, so that adds up to $119.
So where did the extra $44 come from???
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
So where on earth does anyone get the idea of $119 from???
Offline
That's exactly the point.
I was stating the original puzzle with different numbers to make the discrepancy a lot bigger, to show why that way of thinking is clearly nonsense. The original one confuses people because there's only one missing dollar.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Sometimes its better to expose the absurdity of a piece of choplogic reasoning by lucid mathematical demonstration than by inventing an even more absurd example based on the first.
Offline
Sometimes its better to expose the absurdity of a piece of choplogic reasoning by lucid mathematical demonstration than by inventing an even more absurd example based on the first.
Oh now .... that is clearly absurd!
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
Pages: 1