You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
All right 10 points to whomever finds the fallacy in this proof
e...the red-headed stepchild of math.
Offline
since your taking the square root, you need ±
The Beginning Of All Things To End.
The End Of All Things To Come.
Offline
So close but not quite on target, 5 points.
e...the red-headed stepchild of math.
Offline
Since we know that cos x is positive when
, and negative when .Offline
I guess its more like
The trick of this is that, he changed the domain and range
Offline
That's correct, but the more obvious fallacy lies in the property:
e...the red-headed stepchild of math.
Offline
That's correct, but the more obvious fallacy lies in the property:
This property holds true for fractional exponents as well, but only when a is positive, which is not the case for the trig function.
It will hold for negative a if the denominator of the fractional exponent (bc) is odd (although in this case it isn't).
Last edited by Daniel123 (2008-05-12 03:27:34)
Offline
Yes but whether or not the "a" is negative or positive must be established before applying the property and that's not the case here because the property is applied before pi is substituted in.
e...the red-headed stepchild of math.
Offline
Pages: 1