You are not logged in.
I tried 0.61803 in the animation and got a straight line. I had previously worked well with .318
Edit to add: I went back and tried .318 again and it returned a straight line.
I am having some difficulty with direct variations. Can you help?
Here is the problem: A student earns $0.65 for each mistake she finds in a text. Sketch the equation of direct variation.
Thanks in advance for the help.
~Jodie
The equation you are looking for is y = .65*x
I may quite possibly be wrong, but I interpret the problem like this:
let the current time be T minutes. T is measured in minutes.
let the number of minutes be 0 at noon.
Therefore, T is the number of minutes that have passed since noon.
Writing 3PM in terms of minutes past noon:
3PM = 3 * 60 minutes = 180 minutes
Translating the given information into an equation:
T - 50 = 4(180 + T)
Solving for T:
T - 50 = 720 + 4T
3T = -770
T = -256.667
Writing 6PM in terms of minutes since noon:
6PM = 6 * 60 minutes = 360 minutes
let X be the amount of minutes needed to get to 6PM from the current time.
We know now that:
-256.667 + X = 360
X = 385.667
Therefore it is about 386 minutes to six o'clock.
I'm not seeing how you came up with the initial equation.
I'm also not clear how you ended up with a non-integer result (before rounding).
Problem: Fifty minutes ago, if it was four time as many minutes past three o'clock, how many minute is it to to six o'clock?
Hi, please help me to solve this problem
It is "now" 50+(50*4) = 250 minutes past three o'clock = ten minutes after seven o'clock.
That means that it will be six o'clock again in 650 minutes.
I hate those stupid questions that say:
How many ways can you arrange a $10, $20, $50, and $100 note so that the total adds up to $500 etcetc.
They always appear on those yearly competition tests and stuff...>_<
How are these questions actually done? Is it possible to use simple algebra to explain them or must they be all done in incomprehensible calculus/algorithmic talk?
The number of possibilities can be expressed:
Where x is the total amount, h is the number of $100 bills, f is the number of $50 bills, and t is the number of $20 bills.
(Notice the floor operation in the upper limit of the inner most series.)
Substituting 500 for x yields:
So there are 341 different ways that $100, $50, $20 and $10 bills can be combined to obtain a total of $500.
Suppose we wanted to allow the use of $5 and $1 bills, also. Our expression then changes to:
Where n is the number of $10 bills and v is the number of $5 bills.
Substituting 500 for x yields:
I hope this helps.
1)Find the number of Rectangles on the chess board.
The number of rectangles that can be found on any checkerboard with dimensions n squares * m squares can be represented:
For a chess board, m=8 and n=8. Substituting these values yields:
Let's say that you were God, or you controlled the entire Earth. What would you do if you could do anything to it?
For example, would you end world hunger? Or perhaps, give yourself as much wealth as possible? Would you alter the seasons? Would you make the Earth warmer?
There are many things that one could do in this position. What I'm asking you, however, is what you would do if you were the largest and biggest source of power imaginable, and could destroy or rebuild the Earth by clicking your fingers. I'm interested in what you would do, however, and what you think the right thing to do.
Then, when you've done that, consider this; You can only change one aspect of the Earth in one way. What that change is is up to you.
Assumptions:
1. God created the universe, including its contents
2. God is all knowing.
3. God is all powerful.
Based on these two assumptions, I would do absolutely nothing. Any intervention (via miracles) would imply that I did not get it right the first time when I created the Earth, contradicting assumptions 2 and 3.
Of course, this logic also implies that free will is an illusion. I don't feel this is an unreasonable conclusion, considering that a true Theory Of Everything (Unified Field Theory) would imply the same thing, as anything could be predicted based an the initial state of the universe.
I don't get it.........
See attachment.
Find Fourier transform
x(t)=1/(1+(t/3)^2
Thank you
SYNTAX ERROR! Missing )
Game theory of course has just about everything to do with computer science and AI.
And Economics, though many economists would (or do) deny the fact.
I'm not saying that his proof was correct or incorrect, but....
I think he was saying that p=sqrt(2) and q=sqrt(2), so that p and q were both irrational, albeit equal.
English 2.0
Spanish (un poco)
Calculus
BASIC
C (only a little)
These guys just have no sense of humor, Devante. I thought it was pretty funny. Well, maybe not pretty funny, but not as bad as they made it out to be.
Correct.
3. A couple have children. They buy 14 bars of dairy chocolate, 42 bars of dark chocolate, and 84 bars of cadbury's chocolate. The children each share the bars equally between each other. How many children do they have?
Please help simplify the expression:
X5*X7
THANKS..
Once again my first interpretation of a problem was different than Polylog's.
I read: (X*5)*(X*7), which equals 35*X^2.
No other combinations less than 100 work. Dividing by 10 leaves 7, so your number has to end in a 7.
Also, the number is ten more than a multiple of 11, so the first digit must be one more than the second. Therefore, 87 is the only solution.
Impressive logic.
Please convert the equation into exponential form:
X=log4Y
Thanks
X = log(4Y) is the same as 10^X = 4Y
Notice polylog and I have interpreted your problem in two different ways. Whoever interpreted it correctly offers the answer you seek.
All this means is that there exists no circle such that both it's diameter and circumference have integer lengths.
And, there exists no circle such that both it's diameter and circumference have rational lengths.
95. I have four wings, but I cannot fly, I never laugh and never cry; On the same spot I'm always found, toiling away with little sound. What am I?
93. A man lives on the 50th floor. When returning home, this man takes the elevator to the 20th floor and walk the rest of the way up by stairs. Other nights, he would take the elevator straight up to the 50th floor.
Why does he do this?
94. Dr. Evelyn Williams, a London-born New York dentist, was preparing to take a wax impression of the right lower teeth of his patient, Dorothy Hoover. Silently, the door behind him opened. A gloved hand holding an automatic appeared.
Two shots sounded. Miss Hoover slumped over, dead.--
"We've got a suspect," Inspector Winters told Dr. Haledjian at his office an hour afterward. "The elevator boy took a nervous man to the fifteenth floor -- Dr. Williams has one of six offices on that floor -- a few moments before the shooting. The description fits John 'Torpedo' Burton.
"Burton is out on parole," continued the inspector, "I had him picked up at his rooming house. As far as he knows, I want to question him about a minor parole infraction."
Burton was ushered in and angrily demanded, "What's this all about?"
"Ever hear of Dr. Evelyn Williams?" said the inspector.
"No! Why?"
"Dorothy Hoover was shot to death less than two hours ago as she sat in the chair in Dr. William's office."
"I've been sleeping all afternoon."
"An elevator operator says he took a man answering your description to the fifteenth floor a moment before the shots."
"It wasn't me," snarled Burton indignantly, "I look like a lot of guys. I ain't been near a dentist's office since Sing Sing. This Williams, I bet he never saw me, so what can you prove?"
"Enough," snapped Dr. Haledjian, "to send you to the chair!"What was the basis of Haledjian's remark?
92. The 6 foot 4, 240-pound body of Earl Moon lay on the tile veranda amid a welter of shattered glass. Dr. Haledjian studied the left side of Moon's jaw, which was bruised outside and bloody inside from a cut caused by two broken teeth. The bruise on the back of the head showed where Moon was struck tiles. The back of the dead man's sports jacket was stitched with glass splinter.
"Apparently somebody punched Moon awfully hard on the side of the jaw," mused Haledjian, "Moon was thrown backward and he crashed through the sliding glass door. Falling, he struck his head on the veranda tiles and died of a broken neck."
"That confirms the account, we have from Buster Epps, a neighbor," said Inspector Winters.
Epps moved from behind the inspector and stared in disbelief at the body. He still seemed in a state of shock.
"I was tending my roses about half an hour ago when I noticed Moon and a stranger standing near this glass door. The stranger was not quite as tall as Moon, but just as broad. And he handled himself like a professional boxer. They seemed to be quarreling, but the door was shut and I couldn't overhear distinctly," continued Epps. "Suddenly, Moon swung his fist. The stranger sidestepped expertly and hooked a left to Moon's jaw. Moon went crashing through the glass. He struck his head -- I could hear the crack! The stranger fled immediately. I called the police when I couldn't overtake him."
"Now now, Mr. Epps," said Haledjian, "Suppose you tell us what really happened."Why didn't Haledjian believe Epps?
91. The thieves spent 6 hours in the home of Ted Duda. At first they searched the house, trying to find where he hid his huge diamond, valued at half a million dollars.
Then they tried beating the information out of him. They fled at dawn, fearing detection.
Fatally hurt, Duda crawled to his desk and typed a note to his partner, John Madden. In a desperate race to type it before he bled to death, he near blindly typed his death note.It read:
John -- four men tried to make me tell where I had hidden the diamond. At first they looked through the house, raving like madmen. Then, in desperation, the barbarians split open the cat! When all failed, they beat me, but I did not tell. I'm dying. The diamond The diamond is hidden in the vane."
"Duda died this morning," Inspector Winters told Dr. Haledjian. "We have his murderers, but not the diamond."
The inspector handed Haledjian a copy of the death note. "We took down the vane, the weathervane, a math, but there was nothing inside it," the inspector said, "We're still searching the house."
Haledjian read the note and said, "You also failed to find the body of the cat, but you did find a broken barrel of liquor."
"Why, yes," said the inspector. "The thieves were throrough. They broke the barrel and every bottle in Duda's little wine cellar."
"How many walking sticks did Duda own?"
The inspector looked puzzled. "One."
"It must be hollow," said Haledjian. "You'll find the diamond inside it."The inspector found the diamond, but how did Haledjian know?
In either proof a guess is used. So false proof.
For instance,
0.999...*10=9.999...
the guess is about the rule to handle multiplication with some form of a "number" with infinite digits, which is neither a natural logic of product involving a number with finite digits, nor testified by any human experience.
A*B*A^C = B*A(C+1)