You are not logged in.
That joke is said to be the funniest one in the world. Whether that means that it's the one that will create the loudest laugh, or make the most people giggle (at the very least), is still under debate.
That was fast.
Guess#4: 691(3B)
Congratz, guys! (once again)
Guess#1: 184 (1c)
Guess#2: 213 (1c)
Guess#3: 769 (2c)
The first one would be simple. Just simplify it.
3(2y)-3y+4=2y+5
6y-3y+4 = 2y+5
3y+4=2y+5
y+4=5
y=1
x=-1 (since they are opposites)
Guess#1: 184 (1c)
Guess#2: 213 (1c)
Guess 1: 184 (1C)
I always get confused by the two types, hehe. Sorry.
Cge, my turn!
Start guessing! ![]()
In the end... is he really there? ![]()
So you see in the dark? ![]()
Your answer was spot on, actually. Good job!![]()
No, not yet. But you're getting closer!
Good luck, again!
Nice conclusions, simron!
It seems that we think differently with these ones, since those are not what I have thought of.
On your number ten,
Thanks for trying to answer the questions, simron:D.
You're on the right track, hehe.
He really should have said DiMaggio, don't you think? ![]()
Yep, coconut. Every human has two kidneys, so if he donates two kidneys, he won't have any left!
haha! one dead boss.
Geometric proof
Another reductio ad absurdum showing that √2 is irrational is less well-known. It is also an example of proof by infinite descent. It makes use of classic compass and straightedge construction, proving the theorem by a method similar to that employed by ancient Greek geometers.
Let ABC be a right isosceles triangle with hypotenuse length m and legs n. By the Pythagorean theorem, m/n = √2. Suppose m and n are integers. Let m:n be a ratio given in its lowest terms.
Draw the arcs BD and CE with centre A. Join DE. It follows that AB = AD, AC = AE and the ∠BAC and ∠DAE coincide. Therefore the triangles ABC and ADE are congruent by SAS.
Since ∠EBF is a right angle and ∠BEF is half a right angle, BEF is also a right isosceles triangle. Hence BE = m − n implies BF = m − n. By symmetry, DF = m − n, and FDC is also a right isosceles triangle. It also follows that FC = n − (m − n) = 2n − m.
Hence we have an even smaller right isosceles triangle, with hypotenuse length 2n − m and legs m − n. These values are integers even smaller than m and n and in the same ratio, contradicting the hypothesis that m:n is in lowest terms. Therefore m and n cannot be both integers, hence √2 is irrational.
...or maybe they'll get different boat next time... ![]()
He's a lawyer, he's NOT supposed to get in! ![]()
I'm not German, but if you're picky, I'm a little bit less than a quarter Spanish, a little bit less then three-quarters Filipino, and a little bit of everything else.
Is he from South East Asia?
(no reason, just want to know)