You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Prove or disprove each of the following statements for all subsets A and B of a universal set
U :
a. P (A ∩ B) = P (A) ∩ P (B).
Yeah I was just wondering where to start with this problem..
Offline
Remember that the power set is a set itself and anytime you want to prove that a set is equal to another set you have to show two things, that is you need to prove that one set is a subset of the other and vice versa. If you have, for example, sets A and B, and you want to show that A = B then you need to show that A is a subset of B and B is a subset of A. That proves that A = B.
So we want to prove:
P (A ∩ B) = P (A) ∩ P (B)
So we take arbitrary x in P(A ∩ B). Since x is in P(A ∩ B) then we know that x is a subset of A ∩ B by definition of the power set. Since x is in A ∩ B then we know that x is in A and x is in B. Since x is in A and in B then it follows that x is in P(A) and x is in P(B). Hence x is in P (A) ∩ P (B). So we have showed that P (A ∩ B) is a subset of P (A) ∩ P (B).
So now we take arbitrary x in P (A) ∩ P (B). So it follows that x is in P(A) and x is in P(B). By the definition of the power set, it follows that x is a subset of A and x is a subset of B. Since x is a subset of A and B, then it follows that x is in A ∩ B. Since x is in A ∩ B, then it follows that x is in the power set of A ∩ B, that is x is in P(A ∩ B). So we have showed that P (A) ∩ P (B) is a subset of P(A ∩ B).
This completes the proof that P (A ∩ B) = P (A) ∩ P (B).
Last edited by LuisRodg (2008-10-28 23:48:47)
Offline
The arrows in the above proof can all be reversed to prove the reverse inclusion.
Hence
Offline
In the case of unions, however, the same method will only work in one direction but not the other. We only have
Obviously any subset of A or any subset of B is a subset of A ∪ B, so this is true intuitively. It is also fairly clear that, on the other hand, there are subsets of A ∪ B that are not subsets of A or subsets of B. Foir example, if
then
but andOffline
Hello Jane,
Was there anything wrong in my written proof?
Thanks.
Offline
ooooooooooooh I get it now. Thanks!
But as another example, say we are given an equation for an arbitrary element in a set X say x = 5a + 3 (where a is an int) and a set Y with an arbitrary element y = 5b - 2. So I have to prove that the element x is in the set Y and the element y is in the set X right?
Offline
Pages: 1