You are not logged in.

Can somebody explain contour integration to me a little bit? 
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

Do you want to see it work or you want a theoretical discussion?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

An example would be nice.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

Please integrate that.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Stefy, check this out:
http://walet.phy.umist.ac.uk/MaMe/MMA/Contour.pdf
Offline

Please integrate that.
How do I do that?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

Get the poles first.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Okay, that is the easy part.
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-03-27 03:45:16)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

Take the positive 2, do you know why?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

No...
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

The limits of integration are positive so we only take the positive poles.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Since when can complex numbers be positive and negative? Do you want their real parts to be positive or...?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

I get the poles like this
You take the ones that do not have a minus sign in front. See the drawing provided later to tell which poles to use.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

I think those are the 1. and 3. in my list.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

Now get the residue of those two poles. This is done in a couple of ways. I prefer the formula. If you like your own way use it.
If you chose the right ones (the ones in red ) you will get:
Once you have the residues you are almost done. Tell me when you get mine.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

hi bobbym,
Would you mind explaining how to get the 'residues' ? Thanks.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you!  …………….Bob 
Offline

Hi;
One way uses the Laurent series. I do not know it offhand. The other way zetafunc and I were using just a couple of days ago. It is just a formula. Hold on while I get it.
As usual I did not write it down but Wiki has it:
where c is a pole and n is its order.
Ex:
has 2 poles i and -i. To get the residue of i we say n =1 and c = i.
The whole formula simplifies to
which equals - i / 2
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Many thanks.
Give me a week or so to get my brain around all of this and I may have more questions.  
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything;  you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you!  …………….Bob 
Offline

Hi;
I added some stuff to post #17.
Give me a week or so to get my brain around all of this
If you can get it in a week then you will have far surpassed me. I never did get it, despite having it explained to me at least 5 times!
Rule 1 of my signature applies! To some, it only applies maybe 3 or 4 times. For me I stopped counting after 10000.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Hi bobbym
Yes, I am getting those residues. What now?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Sum the residues, and multiply the sum by 2iπ.

Hi zeta;
I was going to ask you to come in here and help out. We were just working on this!
Hi anonimnystefy;
Normally 2 π i but here we are only taking half the contour so it is π i
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

pi*sqrt(2)/4?
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-03-27 23:40:39)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline

Correct! Wunderbar!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Yes, I have. Did you see post #23?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline