Math Is Fun Forum
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2005-12-02 15:37:34
- Viny
- Guest
4; 6; 8 and 9
Please help me, Someone asked me what is the BIGGEST value to put these four numbers ( 4; 6; 8; and 9 )together, use whatever math posible.
Please answer to my email address : [snip]
Thanks a million
Last edited by MathsIsFun (2005-12-02 16:24:28)
#2 2005-12-02 16:26:04
- Flowers4Carlos
- Member
- Registered: 2005-08-25
- Posts: 106
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
uh oh! you are not allowed to post your email. you gotta send in your birth certificate to rod proving you are of a certain age first 
and as for your query.... i guess it would be (4!)^(6!)^(8!)^(9!)
my calculator can't even handel 2^9!
Offline
#3 2005-12-02 16:29:06
- MathsIsFun
- Administrator
- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,713
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
Sorry, had to remove your address for "internet safety" reasons.
9864! (that is 9864 factorial ... 70! has about 100 digits, 9864! will possibly have tens of thouands of digits)
But that may be cheating ...
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
#4 2005-12-02 16:30:36
- MathsIsFun
- Administrator
- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,713
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
Haha, both with similar idea!
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
#5 2005-12-02 16:47:55
- Jai Ganesh
- Administrator
- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 48,413
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
I think 4^^^6^^^8^^^9 is a much bigger number. You can use any number of '^' and keep increasing the number. There's no end to it.
If you are interested in knowing what x^^^y or x^^^^y is, go to this page.
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
#6 2005-12-02 18:01:33
- MathsIsFun
- Administrator
- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,713
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
Ginormous numbers. Good link Ganesh.
Conclusion: we need to set a limit on the operators then, or you could just use 4^^^^^..., or even 4!!!!...
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
#7 2005-12-02 21:51:02
- Jai Ganesh
- Administrator
- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 48,413
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
#8 2005-12-02 21:52:07
- mathsyperson
- Moderator
- Registered: 2005-06-22
- Posts: 4,900
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
For the 4!!!!!, you'd need to use brackets to show what you meant.
4!! just means 4*2. 5!! is 5*3*1, and so on.
Double-factorials are less than their single-factorial counterparts (except with 0, 1 and 2)
But that may be cheating...
Viny did say we could use whatever math[s] possible.
I think Flowers4Carlos's version would be higher, but that's just a guess.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
#9 2005-12-02 21:56:52
- Jai Ganesh
- Administrator
- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 48,413
Re: 4; 6; 8 and 9
Viny did say we could use whatever math[s] possible.
Okay, what about 4->6->8->9? This is geater than Graham's Number! 
(-> is chained arrow notation of John Conway)
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
Pages: 1