You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Last edited by zetafunc (2017-01-15 11:20:56)
Offline
Hi;
I do not understand about R(t), L(t), can you explain further.
The numbers you are suggesting are every other Catalan number.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Suppose we have a sequence (()()) -- that's 6 brackets long. Then:
L(1) = 1, R(1) = 0 -- taking the first bracket
L(2) = 2, R(2) = 0 -- taking the first two brackets
L(3) = 2, R(3) = 1 -- taking the first three brackets
L(4) = 3, R(4) = 1 -- taking the first four brackets
L(5) = 3, R(5) = 2 -- taking the first five brackets
L(6) = 3, R(6) = 3 -- taking all six brackets
In this case, we see that the only value of t for which L(t) = R(t) is t = 6.
Yes, they are the Catalan numbers. But I'd like to know how to get that result combinatorially.
Last edited by zetafunc (2017-01-15 12:19:45)
Offline
Hi;
I think I understand the problem now. I have notes on this bracketing problem somewhere. I am looking for them now.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
OK, let me know what you find.
I found this: http://www-math.mit.edu/~djk/18.310/18. … theses.pdf
Offline
Hi;
Thanks for the link. I understand how you want to count them say for ()()(). But what is the question you are asking?
I do see the formula you are conjecturing on page 5 of that pdf.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Pages: 1