You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Topic closed
Investigate the limit of f(x) as x tends to c at the number c.
{2x + 1 if x ≤ 0....top portion of piecewise function.
{2x if x > 0..........bottom portion of piecewise function.
The number c = 0.
Solution:
If c = 0, I should use the top portion of f(x).
That is, 2x + 1.
Let x = 0.
2(0) + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1.
I say the limit of f(x) is 0 when c = 0.
I hope this is correct.
Last edited by nycmathguy (2021-06-03 17:32:28)
Offline
Is there a bit missing from this question? The definitions for the function do not have any 'c' in them, so how are we supposed to know what c is. Or has your finger just slipped and typed c when you meant x?
I've sketched the graph and there's a discontinuity at x = 0. The left limit is y=1 and the right limit is y = 0.
So the usual conclusion is to say there is no consistent limit at x = 0.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Is there a bit missing from this question? The definitions for the function do not have any 'c' in them, so how are we supposed to know what c is. Or has your finger just slipped and typed c when you meant x?
I've sketched the graph and there's a discontinuity at x = 0. The left limit is y=1 and the right limit is y = 0.
So the usual conclusion is to say there is no consistent limit at x = 0.
Bob
Hello Bob. Good morning. I did not make a typo.
Here are the specific instructions:
Use a graph to investigate the limit of f(x) as x tends to c at the number c.
Sullivan provided the value of c to be 0. I decided to solve it algebraically. However, if I must check the limit from the left and right, how is this done algebraically in terms of piecewise functions?
Offline
OK. I'll say what I think is the answer.
I think that all values of c need to be considered.
(1) c< 0 lim = 2c+1
(2) c> 0 lim = 2c
(c) c=0, indeterminate.
That's the best I can offer I'm afraid.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
OK. I'll say what I think is the answer.
I think that all values of c need to be considered.
(1) c< 0 lim = 2c+1
(2) c> 0 lim = 2c
(c) c=0, indeterminate.
That's the best I can offer I'm afraid.
Bob
Unfortunately, this is an even number problem in the book to which there is no answer in the back section. I don't know if you are right or wrong.
Offline
Bob wrote:OK. I'll say what I think is the answer.
I think that all values of c need to be considered.
(1) c< 0 lim = 2c+1
(2) c> 0 lim = 2c
(c) c=0, indeterminate.
That's the best I can offer I'm afraid.
Bob
Unfortunately, this is an even number problem in the book to which there is no answer in the back section. I don't know if you are right or wrong.
I went back to see if the author has a sample problem for piecewise functions.
Luckily, Sullivan does provide a sample for a similar question. I will use the sample question in the textbook as a guide to help me solve problem 30.
30. Investigate the limit of f(x) as x tends to c at the number c.
The number c is given to be 0.
{2x + 1 if x ≤ 0....top portion of piecewise function.
{2x if x > 0..........bottom portion of piecewise function.
We want to do find the limit as x tends to 0 from the left and right.
Find the limit (2x + 1) as x tends to 0 from the left.
2(0) + 1 = 1
Find the limit of 2x as x tends to 0 from the right.
2(0) = 0
The left handed limit DOES NOT EQUAL the right handed limit.
Thus, the limit of f(x) as x tends 0 does not exist.
You say?
Offline
That's what I said in post 2.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
That's what I said in post 2.
Bob
I like calculus already. I will post a few more piecewise functions before moving on.
I do hope my questions and replies help others as well.
Offline
Pages: 1
Topic closed