You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
1.Find a function f: R → R that is three times differentiable on R but not four times.
2.Let the functions f and g: R → R be three times differentiable. Calculate (f .g)^(3).
Offline
Hi YHWH,
Welcome to the forum.
1.Find a function f: R → R that is three times differentiable on R but not four times.
It might be easiest to start with a function that isn't differentiable at a single point (say, x = 0) and work backwards.
Consider a function which returns 1 for positive values of x and -1 for negative values. What function could you differentiate to get that?
2.Let the functions f and g: R → R be three times differentiable. Calculate (f .g)^(3).
This is a demonstration of Leibniz's rule for differentiation. Use the product rule to determine the first derivative -- then differentiate again, and again, and see if you can spot a pattern.
Offline
hi zetafunc,
I'm not fully getting what the second part means.
I'm calling the function f4 = -x when x< 0; = 0 when x=0; and = x when x>1. This V shaped pair of lines has a gradient discontinuity at x =0 so is not differentiable there.
That gives f3 = -(x^2) / 2 when x< 0 etc. Both the LH limit and the RH limit as x tends to 0 give the gradient as 0, so this function is everywhere differentiable.
Similarly, f2 = -(x^3)/ 6 etc and f1 = -(x^4) / 24 etc. So these are both fully differentiable.
As I have dis-regarded constants of integration there are plenty more functions that work like this, so I suppose I could have different f and g, for the second part. But then what?
Does (f.g)^3 means f.f.f times g.g.g or differentiate three times.
I feel I'm on the wrong track entirely.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi Bob,
No I don't think you are on the wrong track -- your f1 function works (it is three times differentiable on but not four times) because of the cusp at , and you are right that there are a range of possible solutions we could have just by adding constants (or even polynomial terms that vanish after taking successive derivatives).I think the two questions are intended to be separate (the condition that f, g are three-times differentiable is probably just there to ensure that f''' and g''' exist rather than bearing any relation to Q1). I am interpreting (f.g)^(3) as meaning the third derivative of (f times g) but happy to be corrected by the thread starter.
Offline
hi zetafunc,
Thanks for the reply. In that case how about:
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Pages: 1