You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
A trucking company transports goods between Chicago and New York, a distance of 960 miles.The company’s policy is to charge,for each pound, $0.50 per mile for the first 100 miles, $0.40 per mile for the next 300 miles, $0.25 per mile for the next 400 miles, and no charge for the remaining 160 miles. (a) Graph the relationship between the cost of transportation in dollars and mileage over the entire 960-mile route. (b) Find the cost as a function of mileage for hauls between 100 and 400 miles from Chicago. (c) Find the cost as a function of mileage for hauls between 400 and 800 miles from Chicago.
I need help setting up the correct function. I will do the rest.
Offline
I like to try and summarise the written information using (in this case) algebra.
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no charge
But, beware. This doesn't show fully what a charge will be, nor does it give you the points for a graph. Foe example, if the distance for a package is, say, 150 miles then the charge would be 100 x 0.5 + 50 x 0.4
So, to get the function you need to include charges for a previous stage and account for how many more miles have been travelled. I'll show what I mean for distances in the 100 - 300 group.
100 < x ≤ 300 total charge = 100 x 0.5 + (x-100) x 0.4
I'll leave you to deal with the other groups similarly. That should enable you to make the graph.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
I like to try and summarise the written information using (in this case) algebra.
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no chargeBut, beware. This doesn't show fully what a charge will be, nor does it give you the points for a graph. Foe example, if the distance for a package is, say, 150 miles then the charge would be 100 x 0.5 + 50 x 0.4
So, to get the function you need to include charges for a previous stage and account for how many more miles have been travelled. I'll show what I mean for distances in the 100 - 300 group.
100 < x ≤ 300 total charge = 100 x 0.5 + (x-100) x 0.4
I'll leave you to deal with the other groups similarly. That should enable you to make the graph.
Bob
Wow! Very informative. I will see what can be done from this point on.
Offline
I like to try and summarise the written information using (in this case) algebra.
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no chargeBut, beware. This doesn't show fully what a charge will be, nor does it give you the points for a graph. Foe example, if the distance for a package is, say, 150 miles then the charge would be 100 x 0.5 + 50 x 0.4
So, to get the function you need to include charges for a previous stage and account for how many more miles have been travelled. I'll show what I mean for distances in the 100 - 300 group.
100 < x ≤ 300 total charge = 100 x 0.5 + (x-100) x 0.4
I'll leave you to deal with the other groups similarly. That should enable you to make the graph.
Bob
Bob,
I am having big time trouble with part A. I like the way you show your graphs using different colors. Can you graph part A for me?
Here is my effort for the algebra part of the problem.
(a) I came up with a crazy piecewise function, which is probably wrong.
C(x) = {0.50x, if 0 ≤ x ≤ 100....Part 1
C(x) = {50 + 0.40(x - 100), if 100 < x ≤ 400...Part 2
C(x) = {170 + 0.25(x - 400), if 400 < x ≤ 800...Part 3
C(x) = {270, if 800 < x ≤ 960...Part 4
(b) For hauls between 100 and 400 miles from Chicago, the cost as a function of mileage is:
C(x) = 50 + 0.40(x - 100), where 100 < x ≤ 400
(c) For hauls between 400 and 800 miles from Chicago, the cost as a function of mileage is:
C(x) = 170 + 0.25(x - 400), where 400 < x ≤ 800
I don't feel confident about my work here. I guesses all my side conditions.
Offline
I've added an extra column to my table:
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5 max cost = 100 x 0.5 = 50
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4 max cost = 200 x 0.4 = 80
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25 max cost = 100 x 0.25 = 25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no charge
C(x) = {0.50x, if 0 ≤ x ≤ 100....Part 1
This looks ok.
C(x) = {50 + 0.40(x - 100), if 100 < x ≤ 400...Part 2
Not x ≤ 400. The upper limit for part 2 is 300.
C(x) = {170 + 0.25(x - 400), if 400 < x ≤ 800...Part 3
Where did 170 come from?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
I've added an extra column to my table:
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5 max cost = 100 x 0.5 = 50
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4 max cost = 200 x 0.4 = 80
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25 max cost = 100 x 0.25 = 25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no chargeC(x) = {0.50x, if 0 ≤ x ≤ 100....Part 1
This looks ok.
C(x) = {50 + 0.40(x - 100), if 100 < x ≤ 400...Part 2
Not x ≤ 400. The upper limit for part 2 is 300.
C(x) = {170 + 0.25(x - 400), if 400 < x ≤ 800...Part 3
Where did 170 come from?
Bob
The number 170 is a typo. I got lost somewhere along the way. I now know that it takes lots of practice to create a piecewise function from given information in a word problem. I could try again later.
Offline
I've added an extra column to my table:
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5 max cost = 100 x 0.5 = 50
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4 max cost = 200 x 0.4 = 80
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25 max cost = 100 x 0.25 = 25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no chargeC(x) = {0.50x, if 0 ≤ x ≤ 100....Part 1
This looks ok.
C(x) = {50 + 0.40(x - 100), if 100 < x ≤ 400...Part 2
Not x ≤ 400. The upper limit for part 2 is 300.
C(x) = {170 + 0.25(x - 400), if 400 < x ≤ 800...Part 3
Where did 170 come from?
Bob
I think I got it now. It took me 2 hours to work this out.
Part A
To graph the relationship between the cost of transportation (in dollars) and mileage over the entire 960-mile trip, I need to calculate the total cost for each segment of the trip based on the given pricing policy.
My breakdown of the total distance of 960 miles placed in different segments.
Let me know if this correct.
First 100 miles:
$0.50 x 100 = $50
Next 300 miles:
$0.40 x 300 = $120
Next 400 miles:
$0.25 x 400 = $100
Remaining 160 miles = no charge.
Is this right?
The total cost C for the entire trip is:
C = $50 + $120 + $100 + $0 = $270
Bob, is the graph here a step function with the cost increasing at each segment change?
Offline
Is this right? No. You're charging too much.
For part 2, 100 miles has already been charged so 0.4 only applies for 200 miles (300 minus 100)
Same for the remaining parts. Subtract the miles that have already been charged to determine how many more miles to charge at the next rate.
A step function graph looks like a staircase, flat parts getting higher.
This graph has sloping lines with gradients 0.5, 0.4, 0.25, 0 so the sections go up in sloping lines except for the last which is flat.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Is this right? No. You're charging too much.
For part 2, 100 miles has already been charged so 0.4 only applies for 200 miles (300 minus 100)
Same for the remaining parts. Subtract the miles that have already been charged to determine how many more miles to charge at the next rate.
A step function graph looks like a staircase, flat parts getting higher.
This graph has sloping lines with gradients 0.5, 0.4, 0.25, 0 so the sections go up in sloping lines except for the last which is flat.
Bob
This problem is giving me too much trouble.
Offline
I'm like the Canadian Mounties; I never give up. I'll post more help if you want. Just say.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
I'm like the Canadian Mounties; I never give up. I'll post more help if you want. Just say.
Bob
Ok. Lead the way. Can you at least provide the right function?
Offline
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5 max cost = 100 x 0.5 = 50
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4 max cost = 200 x 0.4 = 80
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25 max cost = 100 x 0.25 = 25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no charge
So:
0<x≤100 C = 0.5x
100<x≤300 C = 50 + 0.4(x-100)
300<x≤400 C = (50+80) + 0.25(x-300)
400x≤960 C = (50 + 80 + 25)
I've put the 'already paid' amounts in brackets so you can see where the numbers comes from. You can complete the additions in your answer.
Plot these points: (0,0) (100,50) (300, 130) (400, 155) (960, 155) and join them with straight lines.
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
0 < x ≤ 100 cost per mile 0.5 max cost = 100 x 0.5 = 50
100 < x ≤ 300 cpm 0.4 max cost = 200 x 0.4 = 80
300 < x ≤ 400 cpm 0.25 max cost = 100 x 0.25 = 25
400 < ≤ 960 cpm no chargeSo:
0<x≤100 C = 0.5x
100<x≤300 C = 50 + 0.4(x-100)
300<x≤400 C = (50+80) + 0.25(x-300)
400x≤960 C = (50 + 80 + 25)I've put the 'already paid' amounts in brackets so you can see where the numbers comes from. You can complete the additions in your answer.
Plot these points: (0,0) (100,50) (300, 130) (400, 155) (960, 155) and join them with straight lines.
I will keep working on this one and return here if need be to continue our discussion.
Offline
Pages: 1