You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
let a b be sets
f:A->B
suppose there is a function g: B->A with the property that g(f(a))=a for all aEA. show that f has to be injective
please help!!!
Offline
If you assume that f is not injective, you should be able to reach a conclusion that g is not well defined. To rephrase this proof in a way that makes sense, it is saying that if f has an inverse, then f is injective.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
the answer should not refer to the inverse of f since it may not exist
Offline
If f is injective, then it has an inverse. What you are doing is showing that g(f(a))=a for all aEA. => f is injective => f has an inverse. So you aren't allowed to assume f has an inverse, no. But this is what the statement is saying.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
the answer should not refer to the inverse of f since it may not exist
This sounds like a comment your teacher made when he/she was marking your homework.
I suspect that youve been posting your homework here and copying our solutions for your homework. Do you understand the solutions, though? It is one thing to copy answers and getting marks for them it is far more important to understand the solutions.
Offline
Pages: 1