You are not logged in.
Offline
First you should simplify the expression. Notice that you can remove one n from the expression and get n/(n-1)! as your series. I would then separate the second n from the expression by making another faction that is less than 1:
The second fraction will be less than 1 for all n > 3, so it can be dropped for the purpose of determining convergence. We're now left with the more simple summation of 1/(n-3)!. Since we're testing for convergence all that matters is how the sum behaves as n approaches infinity, so in order to simplify the expression further we can remove the -3 portion in the denominator to leave us with the following expression:
From here do a comparison test. Find a series that you know converges and show that it is greater than your series. This will prove that your series converges. My advice would be to go with 1/2^n.
Wrap it in bacon
Offline
Comparison test is not really needed as your last summation is equal to e.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
Can't you just do a ratio test from the start?
The ratio between terms of the sequence you're summing converges to less than 1, and so their summation converges also.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline