You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi, below is a question on indented contour where I have the solution but don't understand what's going on.
The question goes like this :
Find
Well my question is why we take only half the residue on
and? Isn't it by Cauchy's Residue Theorem that for a closed positively oriented contourOffline
A lot of times, you take f(z) to be different than f(x) (ignoring the abuse of notation). Make sure that isn't happening here. Otherwise, you seem to be correct.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
By defining indented contour on a rectangle contour
Does this mean that your contour is defined so your singularities lie outside of it? If that's the case, then you have no residues.
"In the real world, this would be a problem. But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist. So we'll go ahead and do that now..."
Offline
The contour
for this question goes something like: __<__
/ \
| 2(pi)i |
-R+2pi(i) -----<--- . -----<------- R+2pi(i)
| |
| |
| |
v ^
| |
| |
-R |______> . ____>_____| R
| 0 |
\__>_/
Where the contour around
and and is a semi-circular arc.Offline
Pages: 1