You are not logged in.
.
Last edited by kylekatarn (2020-02-16 01:46:08)
Offline
n = a natural number?
Perhaps we could start off with a proof for n=1, then onto 2 or perhaps n+1
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline
The binomial expansion of the Left Hand Side
contains two terms, among many, which are
a^a*n and b^a*n which appear to make the LHS greater than the RHS,
but when we assign arbitrary values,
say a=10, b=1,000,000,000 and n=100
the LHS is (1,000,000,010)^1000, which would contain 9,001 digits;
the RHS becomes
100 x (100^1,000,000,000) which would contain more than 2 billion digits!
This happened because we assumed b>>n.
Otherwise, the LHS may be greater.
Say, when a=10, b=100, n=1000.
LHS would be 110^10,000 containing 20,414 digits and the RHS would be much smaller, viz. 100*(1000^100), containing approximately 300 digits!
It appears to me that if one wants to make progress in mathematics, one should study the masters and not the pupils. - Niels Henrik Abel.
Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.
Offline
If you take n=1, then you can disprove both by counter-example.
Take a=1.2, b=0.00001, n=1
That gives (1.2+0.00001)^1.2*1</>(1.2^2)*1^0.00001, meaning 1.244...</>1.44.
So, in this case, a²*n^b is larger.
Almost all other cases result in (a+b)^na being larger.
e.g. (3+3)^3*1</>(3^2)*1^3, meaning 216</>9.
So, it can't be proven or disproven.
Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.
Offline
Magic, guys. Disproven by example.
"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman
Offline