You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
FIND the solution set of the following equation:
X^2-3(modulus x-2)-4=0
Book's Ans:
If x≤2:x^2+3(x-2)-4=0
Therefore x^2+3x-10=0
Therefore x=-5 or 2 ]- ∞,2]
If x>2: x^2-3(x-2)-4=0
Therefore x^2-3x+2=0
therefore x=2 or 1 refused because they ]2, ∞]
S.S={-5,2}
on wt bases did he put negative signs in the solution ??!
Plzzzzz HELP
sorry i cant write the equation better than that
Offline
Hi Avva;
I am having trouble following your work. What does X^2-3(modulus x-2)-4=0 mean?
Do you want to solve the equation modulo 2 or modulo x - 2. The whole equation or just (X^2 -3)? Does X = x ?
Last edited by bobbym (2009-10-09 12:54:47)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Sorry i couldn't write it well at first
x^2-3|x-2|-4=0
Offline
Hello, Avva!
. . .
.
Offline
Tx Bro U helped me really
Offline
Could you please help me in solving the below data sufficiency question.
If y > 0, what is the value of x?
(1) |x 3| > y
(2) |x 3| < y
hi Akh
Welcome to the forum.
I find it helps to have a graph for these absolute value questions.
Sketch y = x - 3 and then 'bend' the negative part round so it is positive. You end up with a V shaped graph. (see diagram below)
So, if y > 0, => |x-3| > 0
(1) Consider x > 3 and x < 3 separately.
(a) x > 3
problem becomes
x-3 > y > 0 => x > y + 3
(b) x < 3
problem becomes
3 - x > y > 0 => 3 > x + y
(2)
|x-3| < - y
(a) x>3
problem becomes
x-3 < -y => x + y < 3
(b) x<3
problem becomes
3-x < -y => y < x - 3
Hope that helps,
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi Bob
I don't think your answer is correct. y isn't 0 it's less than or equal to it, so the answer should be in terms of y. e.g. Not all reals except 3 are answers to |x-3|>5.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Good point. I'm talking rubbish again.
I shall edit that post.
Thanks,
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
You are welcome. I'm a better proof-reader than I thought. Still not a good one, though.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
You are excellent for keeping me from talking rubbish and that's a great help. I've edited the post now. Please cast your proof reading eye and tell me if you think I've got it now.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi Bob
(1) is okay now. I just recommend solving totally for x in terms of y. i.e. turn 3>x+y into x<3-y.
(2) is partially okay, but you will see that in the first case you have x>3 which comes out later to x+y<3 <=> x<3-y<3. So in that case we have no solution. Same for the other case in (2).
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
I showed a graph. I think I ought to use it more. I should be able to show shaded regions, some of which won't exist (??)
I'll post back when I've got some diagrams.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Ok, I have a satisfactory set of diagrams for this.
(1) x > 3 => x > y + 3 and x < 3 => 3 > x + y
I have shaded these two regions on my first diagram below.
(2) x > 3 => 3 > x + y and x < 3 => y < x - 3
I have shaded these on my second diagram but as we also know y > 0 my shaded regions are outside this constraint so, as anonimnystefy has said, no solutions exist.
Hopefully, that completes this problem.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Pages: 1