You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi
After nearly 20yrs since doing any maths, nearly a year ago now I decided to pick up the baton again and via a AS Maths course have eventually come to Sequences and Series. I have been fine so far with Inductive Definition and and I remember Sigma Notation from ages ago. The problem I am having is with Limit of Sequence.
Specifically 'algebraically finding the limit'
I have been battling with this for about 5 days and looking round the internet for something to help but with no avail.
Here is an example
L = 1/2L + 1/4
Hence, 1/2L=1/4 then L = 1/2
Limit is 1/2.
Another example is
(b) Find the limiting value as n tends to infinity.
then it explains
L = 2-1/3L
Hence 4/3L = 2 then L = 3/2
Limit is 1.5.
I am not seeing how 4/3L is coming from L = 2-1/3L and it is causing me problems.
If anyone could help me understand this I would be very grateful.
David
ps. does this site use LaTEX?
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Hi;
After nearly 20yrs since doing any maths, nearly a year ago now I decided to pick up
Forums are a good place to beef up old math muscles. This one is the best.
Yes it does use latex, I have fixed a little bit of your post. Check to see that it is OK.
Just solve for L.
L = 2-1/3L
(4/3)L = 2
L= 2 * (3 / 4) = 3 / 2 = 1.5
That is the fixed point.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi Bobbym
Thank you for getting back so soon, and for the advice about getting back into maths, very rusty, though I am getting better.
It's ,my daughters 2nd Birthday today and we're expecitng a truck load of people a kids around so I'll take a look at it later on.
Thank you
David
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Cool, Happy Birthday to her, and your welcome.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi David!
Welcome to the Forum and Best Wishes on ur daughter's b'day!!
... I am not seeing how 4/3L ...
its easy..
If two or more thoughts intersect, there has to be a point!
Offline
Hi Guys
Thank you all for you help with this and your support, you are all very kind indeed. And the party went very well. One extremely happy little girl and parents.
O.k, now thats over with, back to the maths.
I found this a couple of times since I restarted, that I have forgotten certain rules regarding Algebra so at times you will just have to bare with me and forgive my ignorance.
So regarding when you add L/3 to the LHS and add it to the L, am I right in considering the L that is added as 3/3L and L/3 as 1/3L.
It seems reasonably straight forward, but I just wanted to be sure before I go on and do my exercises.
Also it would be better for me and others who read my posts if I knew how to write my equations in LaTeX, does anybody know of any good resources from which to learn the basics.
Thanks So Much
David
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Hi David;
Did you save me some cake? Yes, you can say L = ( 3 / 3 ) L so when you add L / 3 you get ( 4 / 3 ) L.
Here is our page on latex.
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=4397
You can pick it up from there or you can use this page:
http://latex.codecogs.com/editor.php
Which will do it for you.
By the way, Welcome to the forum!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes there is plenty of cake left ;-)
I just did my exercises for finding the limits and got them all correct, so very happy over here
and very grateful too.
This forum is really cool.
D
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
.... So regarding when you add L/3 to the LHS and add it to the L, am I right in considering the L that is added as 3/3L and L/3 as 1/3L ...
yes.. you're correct!
just remember that whenever you add two numbers of the form Numerator/Denominator, then just "EQUALIZE the Denominators" and "ADD the Numerators"!
TRY THESE as an exercise if you wish...
also TRY THIS --->
instead of YOUR ---> ;-)
have fun
If two or more thoughts intersect, there has to be a point!
Offline
Hi ZHero
I have
for the first one, though I am stuck on the second.
The first attempt I expanded the
from this I got
as my first denominatorI think I am going wrong, becuase things are becoming huge and I think I am going wrong.
Sorry to be a pain.
David
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Hi David;
Hint: Don't expand them.
Just continue with the next fraction.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi Bobby
I think I have it.
Thank you
David
ps
its 11pm here so I'll get off to bed and check this in the morn.
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Hi David;
That is not the right answer. Try plugging in a = 1 and b = 2 to your answer and then plug it into the original problem. Tell me what you get.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi David!
Just think a little over bobbym's hint above!
hint:consider TWO FRACTIONS at time!!
Good Morning
If two or more thoughts intersect, there has to be a point!
Offline
Hi Bobby and ZHero
when I plug in a = 1 and b=1 to the original problem I get
last time I think I went wrong by factoring out an
I did it again and got this.
however, when I plug a=1 and b=2 into this I definately do not get
Thanks
David
ps. should I continue this on another post about algebraic fractions.
I must seem to you like my daughter seems to me, trying to put the square
into the round hole
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
No, you are fine to continue here. When you are simplifying realtionships they may look simpler but they must remain the same. If an expression was 7/ 8 before you simplified it, it should be 7 / 8 afterwards. This is a good numeric test for whether or not you have performed correctly.
Do not worry , I will take you through the rough parts.
Do you follow what has happened above?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes I follow up until this point, I seem to go wrong when adding the next fraction.
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Now let's simplify that a bit. By expanding to try to cancel terms.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Got it.
Finally
I seemed to be going wrong in the way I was placing my brackets and incorrectly grouping
the terms.
Thank you so much Bobby.
Time for Emma's Dinner and Bath
David
Can feel it coming together.. Slowly but Surely
Offline
Hi David;
Since there are no common terms in the numerator and the denominator, we are done.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Pages: 1