You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
How to prove this?
Offline
Hi
I'm unclear about the exact form of your integral. Are you able to use LaTex commands such as
math]\frac{numerator}{denominator}[/math] (missing [ to stop this being parsed.)
to show which expressions are above the line and which below.
Or add brackets ???
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Sure.
My question is how to prove:
Offline
I think you are asking:
Prove
Is this right? I'm wondering if there's a pi
in this bracket.Bob
Last edited by Bob (2010-08-24 00:52:56)
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Offline
Hi
Now I understand what has been puzzling me. I have no idea what 'the big O notation' is.:(
Maybe someone else will know and pick this up.
Sorry
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi ck29205325
I have some understanding of Big O or Landau notation cause I do some work with asymptotic forms but I am not getting anything either so that 's not it either.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Pages: 1