You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
the angle bisector of two lines ax + by + c = 0 & px + qy + r = 0
is the locus of pts whose perpendicular distance from both lines is same.
We write this mathaematically as
|(aX + bY + c)/sqrrt(a^2 + b^2)| = + or - |(pX + qY + r)/sqrrt(p^2 + q^2)|
How do we differentiate between the two???
ie which one is acute angle bisector and which one is obtuse????
Offline
hi 123ronnie321
The gradient of the first line is given by tan F = -a/b
and for the second, tan S = -p/q
The compound angle formula for tan ( F - S ) then gives
If this is positive then the angle F-S is acute, otherwise obtuse.
Once you have found one bisector, its gradient should reveal where it falls in relation to the two lines.
Unless you want to create a program to do this automatically, I think it is easier in practice simply to inspect the lines on a sketch. (and this will help confirm your answers don't contain computational errors)
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
thanks bob
yes, graphical method is the best.
Offline
hello bob you are absolutely wrong
to diffrentiate acute obtuse angle bisector take one line and one bisector
"LET tan(x) is angle between one line and one bisector if [tan(x)<=1]then bisector is acute angle opther wise obtuse angle bisector"
Offline
Hi Sameer,
you are absolutely wrong
That's a bit harsh.
Your method is shorter but does that make mine wrong?
Andrew Wiles took 7 years to prove Fermat's Last Theorem. Fermat, himself, claimed a shorter proof. Does that make Wiles wrong?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi Bob
hello bob you are absolutely wrong
Yes, that is harsh. I only hope that it is due to his lack of understanding of our language and customs as you once pointed out.
Hi sameer mishra;
Certainly, attempting to correct someone else's work is difficult. It must be done without hurting the other person's feelings. Without being combative. Other people have the same feelings you do, Bob is not made out of cardboard.
I usually phrase it like this," Hi whomever; I am not getting the same answer as you, could you explain to me what you did? Remember your supposed correction to someone else's stuff could be wrong. He might be right!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Ok,
bob and sameer,
to be honest i am not fully satisfied with either of your answers although they are correct. I think i should be more clear with what i am asking.
Can you say which one is obtuse angle bisector and which one acute just by putting some conditions on a,b,c,p,q,r. Like a computer programme.
If numerical values are given i am able to solve. This is what once our teacher had asked us.
Offline
Pages: 1