You are not logged in.
Oooohh is 4c^4 d^2 better?
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Yep, your original answer was darn close!
Mind putting the whole answer together?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I mind very much actually.
Anyways before simplifying is 12 - 12c²d - 4c²d + 4c^4 d² good or just darn close?
Last edited by misheeru (2011-01-14 09:04:31)
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
That is correct. But in the interest of saving paper you should combine like terms.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes, wouldn't want to upset the environmentalists.
12 - 12c²d - 4c²d + 4c^4 d²
= 12 -16c^2 d + 4c^4 d^2?
Last edited by misheeru (2011-01-14 09:10:12)
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
That is correct. Need another one I think.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Me too, especially since I am not sure what to do with this one:
(a + b - c)(a + b + c)
There are 3 per parenthesis rather then 2... do I need to do this one differently?
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Well, you cannot use foil or can you?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I don't know, can I? I mean there is an extra term in each parentheses that will be neglected if I use regular foil, will it not?
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Yes, that is why foil is such garbage. I do not use it. Does your teacher demand it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yep.
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Did he/she/it explain a method to use foil on a trinomial like that?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
No... but I found an example.
The example seem rather confusing... but I'm going to try and figure if you...
Would you like to see it? I can type it out here. Maybe you can explain it better.
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Type it out please. I mean now!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Well I never...
Ex: ( a + b - 3)(a + b + 5)
= [(a + b) - 3)] [(a + b) + 5)]
replace a + b with x; x = a + b
= (x - 3)(x + 5) = x² + 2x + 5
replace x with a + b
= (a + b)² + 2 (a + b) - 15
= a² + 2ab + b² + 2a + ab - 15
Last edited by misheeru (2011-01-14 10:00:41)
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Please check your first line again.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
sorry, forgot the 5
i edited the original post
Last edited by misheeru (2011-01-14 10:02:28)
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
That answer is darn close. Check your work you have made an error.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
That is not my work! That is the example given to me!
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Have you copied it correctly? That part is yours...
You have:
You need this:
See it now?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi Guys.
Hello! Eaten yet?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Heya Sarah!
Yep bobbym. I just checked, I copied their answer down exactly.
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline
Do not worry about it. It is a typo in the book my answer is correct.
I did not know that you could follow the substitution that was made. Did you?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Well I am confused... and I still do not know how to solve the problem I posted earlier...
No, I have no idea what you are even talking about.
Of Moons, Birds and Monsters
Offline