You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
hi,
the question says:
ln(2x+6) + ln(8x) = 2ln(x)
here is what i did to get one root:
so x = 0 and x = -1.2...
it says i got the -1.2 right, but the x = 0 is wrong and -3.2 is the right answer...
could anyone explain how i could end up getting -3.2 as the right root?
i understand you cannot take ln of 0.
thanks!
hi
Where you have 18, I think you meant 48.
Try that.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
hi,
i cant believe i made that mistake, i am so stupid..i have no idea why i did that.
however, even if i had done that, that would mean i get -3.2 as a root, from factorising to x(5x + 16) = 0.
however, how would i get the root of -1.2?
thanks
Hi,
x = -3.2 is the only solution.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
hi,
ok...so how do i know when x = 0 is a solution, and when it isn't? is there a way of doing it without having to check? for example, i know ln(0) is undefined, but if i get lots of log terms in one equation then i may be able to get an equality showing that it isn't undefined, for example, combining the ln terms...
not sure. anyway, my textbook is wrong
thanks!
Hi mathlover002,
is there a way of doing it without having to check?
I don't think so, we should always check.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
hi
x = 0 ?
If you regard infinity as a number (which you shouldn't) with the property
any finite amount + infinity = infinity
then (ln 6) - ∞ = - ∞ is 'kinda' ok. But you're not supposed to do that with infinity as it isn't a number.
Sometimes when an equation is manipulated 'solutions' drop out that don't fit the original problem.
I'm trying to remember / make up a good example of this. I post again when I've got one.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi mathlover002,
i understand you cannot take ln of 0
Can you take ln of a negative number?
Offline
Hi,
Can you take ln of a negative number?
Yes.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
hi
As promised in post #7, here is an equation that will seem to have two solutions:
Try to solve or look here for my solution
so it looks like x = 3 or x = -2
but only one of these values fits the original problem!
Which?
And can you see where the other one came from?
Bob
Last edited by Bob (2011-05-21 06:22:25)
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Pages: 1