You are not logged in.

Yea so my logic is that the first card will always be 100% correct, the next card has a probability of 36/51, and the third will be 22/50, but the fourth has to be the compliment so 42/49. Does that make sense?
Offline

No, hold on one second. You have not given all the rules. What is a 3 card badugi?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Ok so basically you are dealt 4 cards, out of the 4 cards, 3 of them have different suits and different values but the last one is either the same suit/value as one of the three. What are the odds of this? 
I think you misread the question before.
Offline

What about a 3 card badugi. Are you saying it does not matter if some of them are badugis?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

There is never a 3 card badugi, for a badugi you need 4 cards with 4 different suits and values.
Offline

In other words, you are one card away from a Badugi. This is fairly tricky, so be careful with the counting here. The correct answer is between 55% and 60%.
Offline

Okay, I will work on it and post when I have something.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Hahaha I knew I was right about the balls and slots, I was just mixing up the variables
Offline

Hi all,
Let me check whether I understood it correct.
First, I'll calculate the number of ways to get a badugi:
52*38*24*10 ways
Do we agree?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline

Hi gAr;
That is a little off.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Hmmm, what went wrong?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline

Hi;
It is very difficult to do it that way. I always seem to leave someone out. The right answer I think is 52 * 36 * 22 * 10 another way
 is
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Hi,
I don't understand.
First card can be any: 52
Second card the different suit, and different value: 52 - 13 -1 = 38
Third : 52 - 26 - 2 = 24
Fourth : 52 - 39 - 3 = 10
Something wrong here?
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline

Hi gAr!
Its actually 
second card: different sut different VALUE so 52 - 13 - 3 = 36
third card: 52-26 - 4 = 22
Last edited by careless25 (2011-05-29 23:51:35)
Offline

AHHH!! HAHAHA Bobbym i am pretty sure that is not the right answer....remember the hint: it is between 55% and 60%...ur answer is 6.3%
Offline

What answer, I have no answer so far.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Oh! I thot
was wat your answer was.Offline

Yes, that is for a badugi. I was just showing a simpler way for gAr.
How do you know the 3 card problem is 55% - 60%?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

That was stated in the question. (I did not post it when i posted the question)
Offline

3 cases:
1. diff value, same suit as one card 
Final answer:
make sense???
Offline

Hi all,
The answer I get is :
52*36*24*39 / (52*51*50*49)
I get the same by direct counting also.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline

Hi,
We can consider only 2 cases:
1)
Fourth card is of one of the suites already there:
52*36*24* (36)
2) 
Fourth card is of the other remaining suit:
52*36*24* (3)
Hence 1) + 2) = 52*36*24* (36+3) ways
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline

Hi;
That is what I got but he said it was between 55% and 60% which I do not yet understand.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline

Hi bobbym,
Since computer too verifies it, I guess 55-60% must be a mistake, or the question is incomplete.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline

That is what I was thinking.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
 Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline