You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
In attempting this I arrive at
Then finding the cdf of
I have:So my cdf is
Then the pdf is the derivative of this
All critiques are welcome!!
Last edited by lindah (2011-06-20 22:28:47)
Offline
hi Lindah,
I don't think I've got the problem fully.
All I see is
If U is uniform in {0,1] find the cdf and pdf of root U
What am I missing?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Hi Bob,
That is all we were given for the question (per the past paper I am looking at).
Offline
Hi;
How did you get the 1 for y > 1?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi;
I'm assuming it is 1 due to the definition of a cdf ranging from [0,1]. Is this a valid approach?
Offline
The PDF for U is 1 for 0 <= x <= 1 and 0 elsewhere so I would think that it should be like this.
What do you think?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobby,
I am not sure
I previously did it that way as per http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=15626, but in post #11 Bob corrected it with the last part of a cdf should be 1.
I am also follows the example I found here (the very last question):
http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~larry/=stat705/test1sol.pdf
Last edited by lindah (2011-06-21 02:44:08)
Offline
Hi;
Yes, I think he is right now! Good point! Thanks for refreshing my memory. You are correct.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Pages: 1