You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
3 no. are choosen from {1,2,3,..........,8} with replacement, Then find the probability that min of choosen no. is = 3
Given that max. of choosen no. is = 6
Offline
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi juan
Let's calculate the total number of ways to choose the three numbers such that one is 6 and all of them are smaller.
One number is 6 and the other two numbers are from the interval [1,6] so for both numbers we have 6 possibilities. The total number is 6*6=36.
Of those the number of posibilities when of the other two numbers one is 3 and the other is between 3 and 6 is 4.
The probability is 4/36=1/9.
Nfortunately,my solution doesn't match up with bobbym's so it might be correct and might not.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
choose 3 and choose 6, and choose between 4 and 5, multiplied by number of choosing sequence possibilities
But it is with replacement, so we have to consider 336 and 366
X'(y-Xβ)=0
Offline
Hi
Hereis another way to see things:
There are 8^3 arrangements with repetition of the digits 1 to 8 , 3 by 3
The arrangements 3 by 3 of the digits 3,4,5,6 containing at least once the digits 3 and 6 are:
3-6-x; 6-3-x; 3-x-6; 6-x-3; x-3-6; x-6-3
x being any digit 3 to 6 included. The total makes 24; the answer would be 24/8^3=3/64
Who knows where is the truth ?
Offline
Hi;
Who knows where is the truth ?
See post #2.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
How do you know you answer is correct,bobbym?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
You should not have to ask that question. You know that before I do a combinatorics problem I start with the answer first and work backwards.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
But the question is not clear,so it is not possible to know the right answer without further clarification.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Nope, that is not correct. There is a definite way to know the answer. Then you can back engineer a reasonable math solution.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It is unclear if all the numbers picked must be less than 6 or only the ones we count.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
An assumption does have to be made on the problem. I have been waiting for juan but he sometimes does not come back to a thread.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Pages: 1