You are not logged in.
bobbym wrote:Do you see what a peak is?
as i understand peak is maximum value .. and 20 , 21 are the maximum . .
so those are peaks
Oh yar we are still not able to decide .
Offline
Hi;
I drew arrows to the peaks in post #20.
To decide you need the data.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hy no .. . How did say that its peak . We can see it graphically ,
but i still do't understand how can say its out peak .
Offline
Do you have the data values? That is how you determine it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
yes i already showed u data values in my #post 1 .
Offline
Count up each type of data value the way I did in post #4. That is how you get those peaks and valleys. You do not need the histogram.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Count up each type of data value the way I did in post #4. That is how you get those peaks and valleys. You do not need the histogram.
Oh u are making me confuse . leave it . now .
I need to work with histogram .
Offline
The histogram is for the eye to get an idea what the data looks like. The data itself is the best thing.
Look at post #4, the data.
There
4 ones
1 two
1 three
3 fours
you do the rest. You will see there are more ones than anything else. That is a peak.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hy Bobby, from post #1, how can we get probability ?
Offline
Hi;
Yes, those are peaks.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
ok but i am asking about probability .
How can we compute probability of each bin ?
Also how can we compute Bayesian formula in histogram post #1 .
As Bayesian formula can show that posterior probability is proportional to density value .
Offline
Hi;
Just take how many is in that bin and divide it by the total number.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
and how about Bayesian formula in histogram post@1 .
As Bayesian formula can show that posterior probability is proportional to density value .
That's y i am interested in Bayesian formula .
Offline
Hi tina123;
I do not understand either term. You will have to explain to me what they mean.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
hy ,, its a just Bayes theorem on histogram data .
Offline
Hi;
I am sorry but I can not apply Bayes theorem here. What question is being asked? I do not know. Hard enough to solve a problem but having to guess at what it is, is too tough.
Please go here so you can ask a specific problem:
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline