You are not logged in.
Solve the logorithmic equation
log(8) x + log(8) (x-63) = 2
The correct answer is listed as 64.
I'm trying to learn and understand the correct way of coming down to that answer with out using a calculator. Thanks.
Offline
Have you tried raising 8 to the power of lhs and rhs?
Just in case you don't kmow:
LHS means "left hand side"
RHS means "right hand side"
Better safe than sorry
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
The correct answer is listed as 64.
I am not getting that. Is this the correct equation?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It should be
Offline
Hi;
Thanks scientia!
As the man said, "Notation, notation, notation!"
"Our ships must all sail in the same direction."-Don Lucchesi
raise up everything to the power of 8.
Plug back in to the original equation to see that 64 is a root.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi!
Or using the laws of logarithms the LHS = log [x(x-63)] so log [x^2-63x] = 2.
8 8
Converting to exponential notation (or making both sides exponents for 8) we have
2
8 = x^2 - 63x so that x^2 - 63x - 64 = 0. And upon factoring the LHS: (x-64)(x+1) = 0.
Hence x=64 or x=-1. We can eliminate the -1 if we don't wish to get into complex numbers.
Converting from log notation to exponential notation and visa versa is simple:
log y = z is equivalent to
x
z
x = y
If we write the base x for both the log and the exponential on the same side (left here) then
the other two quantities ( y and z here) switch sides.
x
Other examples: log 32 = x becomes 2 = 32 (so x=5)
2
x -2
log (1/9) = x becomes 3 = 1/9 = 3 hence x=-2.
3
3
5 = 125 becomes log 125 = 3.
5
and so forth.
logarithms ARE EXPONENTS. It's just a naming device so we can tell what base they are supposed
to go on and to see what the result should be if we put in on that base.
log100
Example: 10 log100 is the exponent we must put on 10 to get 100.
2
Since 10 = 100, log100 = 2.
lnx lnx
e lnx is the exponent we must put on e to get x. Hence e = x.
log N
b
In general b = N so log N is the exponent we must put on b to get N. (b>0 and b<>1).
b
Have a great day (or night as the case may be)!
Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).
LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.
Offline
Thanks, especially bobbym, your process I followed helps a lot.
Offline
Hi;
Actually that thanks should go to anonimnystefy who showed the way and scientia for figuring out what you wanted.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
No, it goes to you guys.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Okay, then I will take all the credit everywhere, for everything.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Everywhere?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Yes, writing the Principia Mathematica nearly killed me.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It nearly killed me reading it.
Offline
Hi;
For that I apologize.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
So, you are the genius behind Russell?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
No, I am doing as you instructed.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
And what is it that I instructed?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
To take credit for everything, everywhere. Did you know I invented aluminum foil?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
And did you know I never said that?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
But you certainly tempted me to do it. Did you realize I am the discoverer of Pluto?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
You do realize that I gave you credit just for this problem?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Then I did not really discover Pluto or write the Principia Mathematica? Perhaps you will now say that I did not invent aluminum foil?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yup!
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Okay, but I did invent the method I used on Agnishom's problem...
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Which problem is that?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline