You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I do not understand it.
Well, I kinda understand its meaning, but I am not sure how to read it or calculate it on a real numbers.
Offline
That inequality means that the probability of the difference between X and mu being greater or equal to k*sigma is less than or equal to 1/k^2.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Yes, I read the definition, but it is not enough, I need a practical example.
Definition also says that it is true for all k>0.
So, if we have k=10:
Last edited by White_Owl (2013-02-19 11:31:37)
Offline
You need to find the probability that |X-3.2|>=18.3 . You can do that by summind the probabilities of all values of X for which that is hreater than 18.3 (which is in this case 0). And you probably know that 0<=0.01 .
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Ok, then lets take the k=2.
Offline
They are both 1. But if you multiply 1 by the probability that X is in fact 7 (or 8), and then sum over all values of X, you will get the probability.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
I am sorry, I do not understand your answer.
You said a=b=1? Where did 1 come from?
What exactly should I sum and why?
I am now even more confused...
Offline
Well? Does anyone have an answer?
Offline
White_Owl,
Suppose you wanted to find
Hopefully it is obvious that
so
Similarly, you have observed that
so
What anonimnystefy is referring to in post #6 is that
I hope this helps.
Offline
Oh! So inequality inside parenthesis in the probability arithmetic means sum of probabilities of all events which satisfy the inequality?
Well, it is kinda strange and unintuitive, but ok. I guess there is some logic in that and I would have to live with it...
But why not just write something like:
Offline
Pages: 1