You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
The problem is:
For which positive integers k is the following series convergent?
My Answer:
For series to be convergent the next inequality should be true (by the Ratio Test):
And now I simplify:
But since k is a constant this limit will never be less than 1. Therefore the series divergent for all possible k.
Did I make a mistake somewhere? Textbook is looking for a convergent series...
Offline
Hi;
Something is wrong right there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I do not think there are mistakes:
Offline
Your first line is good.
Shouldn't manipulations maintain equality with the original assertion?
That does not?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I do not think there are mistakes:
Or are you talking about different equations?
The second line is not correc(k(n+1))!=1*2*3*...*(k(n+1)-1)*(k(n+1))
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi;
That is what I mean, something is bad where I indicated. There could be further mistakes but that is where the first one occurs.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Well, the rest of his current work is okay. But that error is messing up the whole thing.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
anonimnystefy, thank you. I see the mistake now
So my new answer is:
Offline
Third line - in the denominator you have k1*k2*...*kn and you say below it "n times". It should be 1*2*...*kn and below it should be "kn times".
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Yes, of course. Thank you.
Offline
Everything else seems okay to me.
You are welcome.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Pages: 1