You are not logged in.
But to get that you had to introduce new points.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
x0 x1 y0 y1 are the same intersection points. the other one for each polynomial will be the known point.
Offline
Yes, but that polynomial needs 3 known points to be a unique quadratic. You have 2 and one unknown point. You can not determine that quadratic knowing only two.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi Herc11
Do you have a test example we could try?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
What is wrong with post #9? Can anyone get A and B?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I need a of four quadratics.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Ok. You are right. But I am confused with the equation of defining a2.
In equation of a2 only the 4 variables x0 x1 y0 y1 exist.
And
if I have four equations for a2 (I do not know the 4 polynomials, only that they have the same 2 inters. points x0 y0 x1 y1 (unknowns),
I know
each polynomial's leading coef. i.e. a2
and one point of each of the polynomials.
Then from the set of 4 equations of a2, x0..y1 can be defined?
Offline
Me too, and putting more points on the drawing does not give them to me.
I need more info about those quadratics!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I need you to give me the leading coefficient of two more quadratics through those two unknown points and a point on each of those.
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2013-06-20 01:50:27)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
anonimnystefy wrote:
I need a of four quadratics.
So, if you have 4 quadratics plus a point of each of them you can solve it? i.e you can find x0...y1?
Offline
For post #9? Yes any additional info would help. I have been asking the OP to state the full problem. It might be possible to get more info out of it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
anonimnystefy wrote:
I need a of four quadratics.
So, if you have 4 quadratics plus a point of each of them you can solve it? i.e you can find x0...y1?
I think so.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
From just the first coefficient?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
First coefficient of four quadratics and a point on each.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Want to use post #9 and I will provide the two more quadratics since I know what A and B is?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
anonimnystefy
I think so.
I have the same opinion.
Offline
It is more information than you provided in post #1 so I am willing to post the challenge. It is worth a shot.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
bobbym wrote
Want to use post #9 and I will provide the two more quadratics since I know what A and B is?
What do you mean exactly?
Offline
I know the answer for post #9 only because I created it. No one else can know it from that information ( maybe ). I can give 2 more quads.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym
Where does it say that we have only 2 quadratics in the first post??
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
It does not, we just went from there. But so far no one has proved it is possible with n quadratics.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It does not, we just went from there. But so far no one has proved it is possible with n quadratics.
Thats why I am asking.
It seems to me that If there are 4 quad. you can define the 2 interesection points.
Similarly, if the polynomials were of degree 3, 6 polynomials of 3 degree might be needed...and so on...
But I am not sure
Offline
I am going to say that with 4 quadratics or 176 of them you still can not define the two points. That is my opinion.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I am going to say that with 4 quadratics or 176 of them you still can not define the two points. That is my opinion.
Okay, then give me the first coefficient of four quadratics and a point on each of them and I will try finding the 2 intersections.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Yes, give some time. I am very interested in your result. Please hold.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline