You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
sir,if A is a set such tht A=$1,2,3$ and R=[(1,1),(2,2),(1,3)] is it transitive relation?plse explain,
Offline
I'd say so.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
???
Is R the relation
1 --> 1
2 --> 2
1 --> 3
because that doesn't look right to me.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
No, the relation R is {{1,1},{2,2},{1,3}}, like it says.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Sorry. maybe I'm just thick; but how is that a relation? It just looks like a set of ordered pairs.
This is what I think of when I've got a relation:
eg. A = (1,2,3} B = (1,4,9} A is related to be by (element in A)^2 = (corresponding element in B)
Please spell it out for me.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
What you are thinking of is an operation.
A relation is something like =,<=,>=,...
For example, on the set {1,2,3} you can define = as {(1,1),(2,2),(3,3)], i.e., the set of ordered pairs for which the relation holds.
Also,
> : {(2,1),(3,1),(3,2)}
< : {(1,2),(1,3),(2,3)}
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
OK. Thanks. I'm going to use --> to mean 'is related to'
So
1 --> 1
2 --> 2
1 --> 3
looks to me like another way to describe the relation.
Then to test for transitivity I must check out all the three way combinations:
1 --> 1 -->1 Is it true that element 1 --> element 3 ? Yes, because 1 --> 1
1 --> 1 -->3 Is it true that element 1 --> element 3 ? Yes, because 1 --> 3
2 --> 2 -->2 Is it true that element 1 --> element 3 ? Yes, because 2 --> 2
1 --> 3 -->? 3 --> is undefined.
There are no more triples so I have, by exhaustion, tested and proved transitivity for this relation.
How does that sound?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Sounds okay.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Thanks. I'm happy now.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
No problem. Of, course, the standard relartion notation is to use the name of the relation, e.g.:
To note that 1 is related to 3 with respect to the relation R, you'd say 1R3. It's like if you said 1<3.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Pages: 1