You are not logged in.
Hi;
Okay, take all the time you need.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I was interrupted by some errand, boring one indeed.
Bobbym, it seems you mistakenly made a negative sign a positive sign.
The original is the same as the one Anomnystify solved please check the sign at #244. I mean;
3(x-1)/x-9,
Which you made it
3(x+1)/x^2-9.
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2013-08-08 20:32:27)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Hi;
I wrote, that there is a mistake in line 2 of post #244
anonimnystefy wrote:Hi EbenezerSon
With a careful look at signs I think should be,
x-3x-3-3/x^2-9 =-2x-6/x^2-3^2 =
-2(x+3)/(x-3)(x+3)
= -2/x-3Please am I right there.
Thanks.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Please, I mean the problem itself.
You made a negative sign a positive sign.
Here ;
3(x-1). Which you made it 3(x+1).
You check it from one of your post.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
The first line is 3(x+1)
The second line changes that to 3x - 3, that is a mistake.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Please look at #252.
That is the original question.
The first line is -3(x-1).
And changes the second to be,
-3x+3
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You are not understanding what I am saying. Post #244 is wrong at the second line.
Please post the original problem from the book.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
1/1+3 - 3(x-1)/x^2-9.
That is it.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
And what did you get for an answer?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I am not at home now, I will post the original when I get there.
Thanks.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Okay, see you then.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi, Bobbym.
This is the one from the book;
1/x-3 - 3(x-1)/x^2-9
I had -2/x+3 as answer.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Hi;
That is correct!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi;
How did you get,
9^n+2 * 3^n+2 out of 27^n+2?
I have edited it.
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2013-08-11 04:17:33)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Hi;
I did not get that. Where does 23^n come from?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Please, I double check it I have edited.
Thanks.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
27^a = 9^a * 3^a
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It's 27^n+2, and not 27^a.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You can say a = (n+2), same principle.
27^(n+2) = 9^(n+2) * 3^(n+2)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I suppose the base must always be the same in each case. So I percieved it to be,
27^n+2=27^n*27^2=3^3n * 3^3+2.
I had thought should be so.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
I am sorry, I can not follow that. Please bracket it off.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
In fact I have not seen an indicial problem being split to get different numbers as the base. like what is in #269.
.Thiş problem is from indices.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You should learn to latex or to use parentheses better.
That modern notation they are using in that book is not good.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
27^n+2=27^n * 27^2
Thıs is how I mean, I will learn parenthesis in it proper way as you say.
For instance, 6^n+3=6^n * 6^3.
Because, for instance, 3^2 * 3^2=3^(2+2).
What do you say.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
All of that is correct but I have to interpret every bit of it.
When you write 27^n+3 in mathematics that means
It is properly written 27^(n+3) this means
Notice they are both very different.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline