You are not logged in.
We have a 2pi-periodic even function for which
f(t) = 0 when 0 < t < pi-2
f(t) = pi when pi-2 < t <pi
The functions trigonometric Fourier series is
How can we decide the series sum for when
?Hi;
I already summed that series for all t. It involves the hypergeometric series and is quite complicated.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Can't Parseval's formula be used for this?
What did you get using it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I wrote wrong in the last post, it's supposed to be
Please help!!!
Hi ronn
M give the answer of
.Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Hi ronn
M give the answer of
.
Could you PLEASE write HOW to solve the problem?
Hi ronn;
Might possibly be done with a Fourier series.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Are you joking? How can you even think what you are writing is helpful in solving the problem?
Are you joking? How can you even think what you are writing is helpful in solving the problem?
Hmmm, that is kind of harsh and even rude.
You come in posting homework in violation of this rule
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=14654
You show no work, no initiative of your own. When I ask you what you get when you use Parsevals I get no answer.
For your information a Fourier series is a method to sum some series. Please be polite in your replies to any member I was trying to help.
Whether you are in here as ronn or ffd please read the rules
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/misc.php?action=rules
especially #2 and #9.
Getting back to the sum, it is quite easy to derive the answer using Fourier series as I suggested in post #8.
You will end up with
which when x = 1 is the same as anonimnystefy's answer.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I used m:) as you call it. I couldn't do the sum by hand. JimmyR told me that you and him worked it out pretty easily.
How about sharing it?
Last edited by ElainaVW (2014-02-23 02:13:11)
Offline
Anything is easy when jimmyR is helping. Took about 10 minutes. It just so happens that it is related to something I am doing elsewhere. Look there for it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Looks like we have attempted a similar problem before:
#1 and #38: http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?id=16080
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi gAr;
Yes, it is done with Fourier series and works out nice and neat.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi bobbym,
Or by complex numbers and integrals.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Hi;
I was reading a paper on using contour integration on sums as we do on integrals but now I can not remember where it is.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
It's in the link I gave!
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Okay, I will go there.
This one here was easier than any of those.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
I am working a bit with Agnishom on Fourier series. In a little while I will give him this sum to work on. He will enjoy it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Sure he will.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
I am going to go offline for a bit. See you and thanks for coming in.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Okay, see you later.
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline
Sorry bobbym about getting upset. I'm a bit stressed about having to solve this problem (among many others) within a limited time.
Getting back to the sum, it is quite easy to derive the answer using Fourier series as I suggested in post #8.
You will end up with
which when x = 1 is the same as anonimnystefy's answer.
I don't understand how to use the Fourier series to solve the problem. I don't know what "sgn" and we are not allowed to use terms that we haven't learned to solve problems. Could you, or someone else, please show how you mean that the Fourier series can be used to solve the problem.
Hi,
That's one way. Did you check the link I gave too?
We end up with:
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?
"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."
Offline