You are not logged in.
In 2013, there are 100 students taking EXAM
In 2014, there are 150 students taking EXAM
In term of percentage of students within 2014 year, their scores are getting improvement comparing with 2013 year. The main issue is not knowing on how to define the benchmark on 2013.
For example, John's score is 64 on 2013, Mary's score is 73 on 2014, then Mary in 2014 is getting better than John in 2013. Should I use average score on 2013 be benchmark in this case?
Does anyone have any suggestions on how to do statistical comparisons on unequal size groups? so I can compare between 2013 and 2014, in order to determine which year students are doing better.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions
Download file:
http://1drv.ms/1nvIxOA
Last edited by oem7110 (2014-05-29 03:18:03)
Offline
A 2 sample T test might be what you need. Are the two samples independent?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
A 2 sample T test might be what you need. Are the two samples independent?
Two samples are independent, could you please show me on how to apply T test in this case? in order to determine which years students are doing better.
Thanks you very much for any suggestions
Offline
Hi;
Take a good look at this. I am going to use it for your problem.
https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat500/node/50
The method does not seem to care about the different sizes. What are the variances of both populations?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi;
Take a good look at this. I am going to use it for your problem.
https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat500/node/50
The method does not seem to care about the different sizes. What are the variances of both populations?
I get no idea on variances of both populations, can I still apply T Test in my case?
Thanks you very much for any suggestions
Offline
There are 2 T tests. The variances are calculated form the data. Can you provide the data in text form?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
There are 2 T tests. The variances are calculated form the data. Can you provide the data in text form?
Do you have any suggestions?
Thank you very much for any suggestions :>
Text file for download:
http://1drv.ms/1o5pHJU
Offline
I can not download that file. Can you cut and paste the data here.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I can not download that file. Can you cut and paste the data here.
Here you go ...
Thanks you very much for any suggestions
2013 2014
4% 46%
83% 26%
30% 92%
89% 74%
38% 21%
54% 13%
51% 64%
47% 87%
7% 13%
77% 95%
57% 19%
24% 20%
3% 1%
73% 93%
85% 28%
4% 14%
39% 19%
74% 71%
59% 16%
91% 51%
51% 64%
45% 54%
67% 7%
87% 81%
9% 39%
30% 41%
15% 31%
50% 89%
61% 25%
46% 86%
70% 69%
77% 16%
25% 20%
81% 10%
7% 95%
67% 95%
23% 51%
56% 52%
88% 4%
43% 23%
22% 69%
36% 60%
43% 78%
26% 81%
65% 29%
55% 70%
53% 12%
80% 96%
68% 96%
7% 72%
33% 14%
20% 4%
54% 52%
68% 87%
24% 95%
31% 72%
53% 22%
45% 91%
34% 37%
3% 16%
23% 5%
87% 38%
33% 29%
71% 20%
62% 98%
22% 60%
61% 48%
30% 59%
56% 83%
32% 40%
80% 59%
36% 29%
2% 63%
55% 1%
72% 90%
69% 49%
20% 64%
9% 67%
50% 24%
6% 70%
67% 44%
36% 45%
76% 62%
34% 64%
27% 95%
47% 24%
86% 43%
74% 40%
18% 18%
61% 30%
67% 2%
29% 57%
46% 77%
65% 81%
63% 29%
28% 5%
89% 96%
68% 8%
53% 26%
27%
97%
34%
44%
59%
50%
21%
14%
41%
32%
71%
40%
2%
48%
36%
19%
27%
22%
84%
8%
47%
41%
92%
69%
67%
25%
54%
82%
77%
27%
81%
50%
10%
79%
40%
92%
34%
45%
90%
39%
21%
40%
98%
96%
14%
5%
33%
56%
25%
79%
Offline
That does not look like real data, a person scored 1, another 4, a couple scored 7?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.
Offline
Hi;
The variances are not close so we will go with a different test. I am computing it now.
According to what I got there is no reason to assume there is any differences between those two means and we are forced to reject the alternative hypothesis that students are doing better in 2014 as opposed to 2013.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline