You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I was reading something which I found really special. It goes like this : Imagine we have a line with unity division (0,1,2,etc.) Now, we have a point on this line. The point can be on a point of division or it can be contained between two points of division. If it isn't on a point of division, then we can continue cutting the line into 10 equal pieces. (The first piece being 0, the second 1, the third 2,...) So, if my point was between 1 and 2, I'll have 1.0,1.1,etc. We continue this cutting until our point arrives at a point of division.If this arrives, we have two choices : We can pick the interval on the left or the interval on the right. And we can continue this way at infinity.
We also have the following formulae to express our numbers : g+a/10+a2/100+a3/1000+... g being an integer and a being the number of the piece which contains our point.
Now, my question concerns this :
http://i.imgur.com/RlKuUG9.jpg
How can it be possible that we can have 1/4=0.2499... and 1/4=0.25000... Also, for this idea to be valid, must it necessarily be an infinite decimal expansion or I could have the following 1/4=0.249 and 1/4=0.250 ?
Thank you !
Offline
That is a know fact. The usual discussion is whether 1=0.999... The answer is yes and there are much simpler proofs than the one given in that image. The proof in that image is, also, not a very rigorous proof, but it does provide a nice way to visualise both of the decimal expansions.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Well, I gave a resume of the first part, if you want, I can give you the whole.
Offline
Also, must the decimal expansion of 0.249 be an infinite one so that we can say that it is equal to 0.25 ??? Couldn't we have 0.249=0.25
Offline
0.249 is not equal to 0.25. 0.24999... is.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
For a certain reason, I find it weird. So, we can't see that 0.249..=0.25 with the example of the line subdivision because each subdivision point represents a finite decimal. Or am I wrong ? For example, If I have 0.24999 and 0.25000 on my line, I couldn't say that they're equal.... I would need to imagine an infinite process of subdivision of a line to establish the true equality ?
Offline
Well, basically, yes. You need infinite "cuts" to "reach" 0.24999...
For a nice proof of that fact, look at Joel's answer.
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Joel's answer ?What answer ? Who's Joel?
Offline
Oh you mean on stack exchange, right ???
Offline
Yes. The first proof he wrote is commonly used to show the equality. The second proof is a bit more rigorous.
Last edited by anonimnystefy (2014-06-24 09:21:21)
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
Pages: 1