You are not logged in.
Polynomials are in the book, but I am yet to learn them properly.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
By the way, if you can supply me with a link that teaches or deals with polynomial happy will I be
Besides, those problems are treated under indices
Thanks
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2014-08-27 07:13:11)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Hi;
I am unable to solve either of those equation separately without using factoring or the quadratic formula. I will leave the question here and maybe someone else can do it. I am drawing a blank, sorry.
Can anyone solve these equations?
1)
2)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
At the back of the book it gave these as it answers; {x : x = -1, -2}
I will try to solve, I doubt if will get those answers.
Thank you Bobbym
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2014-08-27 07:24:52)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Yes, those are the correct answers. Sorry, I could not do them.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi;
I have endeavored to solve them, I literally used hours, which I had {-1, -2} for the first one and {-1} for the second problem. At the back of the book it has {-1} as the answer for the second problem, so I think I am correct.
Did you say you used factorization and quadratic to solve them, and what are your answers?
Thanks
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Those are the correct answers by factorization. How did you do the first one without it?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Actually with respect to the first one I did used factorization in the course of manipulation, see;
4 3^(2x+1) + 17 3^X -7 = 0
= 4 (3^x)^2 3^1 + 17 (3^x) - 7 = 0
Let 3^x = M
= 4 M^2 3 + 17M - 7 = 0
= 12M^2 - 4M + 21M - 7= 0
= 4M(3M - 1) + 7(3M - 1) = 0
=(4M + 7) (3M - 1) = 0
Let M = 3^x.
4M + 7 = 0
= 4M = -7
=M = -7/4
Again,
3M - 1 = 0
3M = 1
M = 1/3 Let 3^x = M
3^x = 1/3
3^x= 3^-1.
x = -1
I used the same method to do the first one
Last edited by EbenezerSon (2014-08-28 04:01:08)
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
That is what I did! I am sorry, I thought you would not understand it so I did not post it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
The first one;
proceeding from the question:
3^2x 3^3 - 4 (3^x 3) + 1 = 0
= 3^2x 27 - 4(3^x 3) + 1 = 0
= (3^x)^2 27 - 4(M 3) + 1 = 0
Let 3^x = M
(3^x)^2 27 - 4 (M 3) + 1 = 0
= 27M^2 - 12M + 1 = 0
= 27M^2 - 9M - 3M + 1 = 0
= 9M(3M - 1) - 1(3M - 1)= 0
= (9M - 1) (3M - 1) = 0
Let M = 3^X
9M - 1 = 0
M = 1/9
3^X = 1/9 = 3^ -2 = -2
X = -2
3M - 1 = 0
M = 1/3
3^X = 1/3 = 3^-1 = -1
{ X : X = -1, -2}
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
That is very good.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Hi Bobbym please help with this;
Find the value of x in the following equation
2^x - 2^-x = 2
This is similar to the one we solved previously, I tried and had [0] as an answer yet don't understand
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Multiply both sides by 2^x and do what you did before.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Following the question;
= 2^2x - 1 = 2^(1+x)
= (2^x)^2 - 2^(1+x) = 0
Let 2^x = N
= N^2 - 2N - 1 = 0
Factorizing impossible!
What do you say?
If factorization is impossible should one use log? Or the method of completing the square?
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
That can not be factored, you are correct. We need another way.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
The book has at it back zero [0] as its answer, please do it for me to see by using log, I am certain you can get by log application
Thanks!
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Have you copied the problem correctly?
2^x - 2^-x = 2 does not have zero for a root.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
Yes that is exactly what's in the book, I have double check it.
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Please plug in x = 0 and tell me what you get?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
2^0 - 2^ 0 =
1 - 1 = 0 I got zero
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
Does 0 equal 2?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
The book is wrong, I will be inclined to say that, what do you think should be the method that will eventually give you the correct answer?
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
I think the same method to factor but use the quadratic formula to get the roots will get the answer.
I also think the book meant to solve this problem instead.
2^x + 2^-x = 2
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline
I think the same method to factor but use the quadratic formula to get the roots will get the answer.
(I don't get you here)I also think the book meant to solve this problem instead.
I am very sure!2^x + 2^-x = 2
I know only one thing - that is that I know nothing
Offline
You will get the polynomial when you use the substitution of y = 2^x of y^2 - 2y - 1 = 0.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.
Offline