You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I have an object which it's surface Area is 395.2722194 Unit^2. I want to break this number down into the height, width and depth of the object is this possible ?
Offline
No. Without any further information, this object have any shape and size.
Do you know anything else about the object?
Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.
Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.
Offline
That is all I know about the object ?
Offline
do you know what type of object it is? for example, a cube, rectangular prism, etc. ?
Offline
Rectangle !
Offline
hi SuperLynx
If the faces are rectangles and the cuboid has dimensions a by b by c then the surface area is
area = 2ab + 2ac + 2bc
There are (infinitely) many values of a, b and c that will give that value so you cannot specify one unique set of values.
If you choose a and b then you can compute c = (area - 2ab)/(2a + 2b).
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Sorry I don't understand ?
Offline
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
http://i.imgur.com/FdGAlYn.gif
Bob
What are you telling me, I'm still puzzled ?
Offline
If you are seeing the link, you have images turned off.
You can change this in the display section of your profile.
You can also load that image directly from imgur by copying it into your browser.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
The image loaded, my question is; so you can break down the surface area ^2 into the 6 faces of a rectangle ?
Offline
Yes. That is what they mean by the 'surface area of the cuboid'.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
What if the surface is not a rectangle, but shape, for example, a car, or a human body ?
Offline
Those would be tricky to work out. There's no easy formula as people and cars have many shapes.
You could estimate by making a square grid and holding it against the surface and counting up squares. Hard to be accurate though.
There are formulas for some solids: sphere, cone, pyramid etc.
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Those would be tricky to work out. There's no easy formula as people and cars have many shapes.
You could estimate by making a square grid and holding it against the surface and counting up squares. Hard to be accurate though.
There are formulas for some solids: sphere, cone, pyramid etc.
Bob
What if you pretended as though the car, or person was contained, I believe as you are saying in a solid shape; as in a cube etc, that would work ?
Offline
For surface area, it's not as simple as that. If you wanted the volume of an irregular solid, you could enclose it in a solid you could measure, and that would give you an upper bound.
But it is possible to enclose a solid entirely in a finite solid, and yet have an infinite surface area. Does that sound weird ? The 'trick' is to give it lots of nooks and crannies that increase the surface area without increasing the enclosing solid. Have a look at this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menger_sponge
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
How is the program giving me the values posted in my first message for a irregular solid ?
Offline
We have already said that, if it is irregular, then it is not possible to give values. Indeed what would height width and depth mean if it were irregular?
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
What does the surface Area is 395.2722194 Unit^2 represent for a irregular object ?
Offline
Cover the solid in approximate cm squares and count them:
Bob
Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
Sometimes I deliberately make mistakes, just to test you! …………….Bob
Offline
Cover the solid in approximate cm squares and count them:
http://i.imgur.com/vC1eIA8.gif
Bob
I don't understand what you mean ?
Offline
You can not simply derive measurements such as height, width, and depth for a complicated shape such as a human body or car with more data. Even if you had this data, its extremely difficult to do. If your object was simple such as a cube, cylinder, or triangle and had more data,... we could calculate this a lot easier.
Not knowing any more than just the SA of say a box,... we can derive dimensions for say a box but there are infinitely many dimensions. This means the box can be of any shape or even size. If you give us the SA, L, and W, we can calculate the depth for example. If you only give the SA and L, that would mean the width and depth would be infinite.
Offline
You can not simply derive measurements such as height, width, and depth for a complicated shape such as a human body or car with more data. Even if you had this data, its extremely difficult to do. If your object was simple such as a cube, cylinder, or triangle and had more data,... we could calculate this a lot easier.
Not knowing any more than just the SA of say a box,... we can derive dimensions for say a box but there are infinitely many dimensions. This means the box can be of any shape or even size. If you give us the SA, L, and W, we can calculate the depth for example. If you only give the SA and L, that would mean the width and depth would be infinite.
I understand. A program I use only gave me those measurements from a irregular object, the program must be getting the information some how, some way, that is what I want to know ?
We both can agree that the program is not spitting out a random value for the surface area of the object !
Offline
Pages: 1